[Reproducible-builds] [PATCH] ipkg-build: suppress timestamps in gzip headers

2015-06-17 Thread Reiner Herrmann
When creating control.tar.gz, data.tar.gz and $package.ipk tar compresses them with default gzip options. This includes build timestamps in their gzip headers. By setting the GZIP env variable to -n, gzip no longer embeds them, which is a step towards reproducibility. See also [1] for more

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789098: FTBFS: ./conjugue fails with internal error: afligir e arg�ir colidem em FV

2015-06-17 Thread Chris West (Faux)
Source: br.ispell Version: 3.0~beta4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build for me, although it appears to build sometimes on our Jenkins. I suspect something to do with locales or locale

[Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [PATCH] build: create time and date independent binary

2015-06-17 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Thanks for sharing the patches to set U_BOOT_DATE/U_BOOT_TIME/U_BOOT_TZ. I happened to independently work on a similar patch in the last few days: Index: u-boot/Makefile === --- u-boot.orig/Makefile +++ u-boot/Makefile @@ -1231,10

Re: [Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds of FreeBSD in a chroot on Linux

2015-06-17 Thread Ed Maste
On 16 June 2015 at 17:50, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: So in a while, I expect to have set up https://reproducible.debian.net/freebsd/ as well as https://reproducible.debian.net/netbsd/ - but no promises (yet), but these are my plans ;-) Great, looking forward to it!

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789003: Bug#789003: debbindiff: should not try to create device files

2015-06-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Reiner, On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote: This message is coming from unsquashfs btw. (used to extract squashfs images), not from debbindiff itself. I don't think debbindiff can do much there, and I also haven't found an option for unsquashfs to prevent trying to extrect

[Reproducible-builds] Higher entropy notification mail subjects

2015-06-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
[I’m not subscribed, please CC me on replies] Hi, my inbox is full of mails with subject [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Reproducibility state of package haskell-hfuse change... as you can see the relevant part is cut off here. May I suggest to use a more compact subject, e.g. Reproducibility

Re: [Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds of FreeBSD in a chroot on Linux

2015-06-17 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Den 16/06/2015 kl. 23.50 skrev Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org: Reproducible builds enable anyone to reproduce bit by bit identical binary packages from a given source, so that anyone can verify that a given binary derived from the source it was said to be derived. - right now you

Re: [Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds of FreeBSD in a chroot on Linux

2015-06-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Erik, On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015, Erik Cederstrand wrote: The build should be immune to the time of the build, of course. That's fairly easy (e.g. use 'ar -D' consistently and leave DEBUG_FLAGS empty). yup, easy, but this can mean some work. (Which usually can be shared among the upstream

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789040: liblo: please make the build reproducible

2015-06-17 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Source: liblo Version: 0.28-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that liblo could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789071: libxkbcommon: please make the build reproducible

2015-06-17 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Source: libxkbcommon Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libxkbcommon could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789076: lvtk: please make the build reproducible

2015-06-17 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Source: lvtk Version: 1.2.0~dfsg0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that lvtk could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#789003: debbindiff: should not try to create device files

2015-06-17 Thread Reiner Herrmann
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:40:03AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: create_inode: could not create character device /tmp/tmpq_LCg2debbindiff/dev/console, because you're not superuser! create_inode: could not create character device /tmp/tmpx7eb3fdebbindiff/dev/console, because you're not

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789087: lmdb: please make the build reproducible

2015-06-17 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Source: lmdb Version: 0.9.14-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that lmdb could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch overwrites the