Re: [Reproducible-builds] Recent issues with faketime in debian/rules during reproducible-builds builds

2015-10-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:10:27AM +, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hello Axel. o/ :) I rescheduled src:mp4h and it built correctly. No clue what happened, but building 2 times 7k packages per day sometimes something happen... > > Are not all chroots used by the reproducible-builds project setup

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#802304: go-mtpfs: Missing Build-Depends on pkg-config and libusb-1.0-0-dev

2015-10-19 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: go-mtpfs Version: 0.0~git20150802.0.3ef47f9-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, go-mtpfs fails to build from

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Recent issues with faketime in debian/rules during reproducible-builds builds

2015-10-19 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello Axel. I can only give partial answers and minor comments, Holger and Mattia probably have an authoritative answer. > Are not all chroots used by the reproducible-builds project setup > the same way? Assuming that by "setup the same way" we are not talking about all the things that change

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Recent issues with faketime in debian/rules during reproducible-builds builds

2015-10-19 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, most everything here has been answered so far, so just a small note from me. On Montag, 19. Oktober 2015, Santiago Vila wrote: > I don't think that > faketime is a lot special about this. Most of the time a simple > "touch" and options like tar's --owner and --group are enough to > achieve

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Recent issues with faketime in debian/rules during reproducible-builds builds

2015-10-19 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Montag, 19. Oktober 2015, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I don't think that > > faketime is a lot special about this. Most of the time a simple > > "touch" and options like tar's --owner and --group are enough to > > achieve reproducibility. Personally, I have not seen