[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803050: miaviewit: FTBFS: configure: error: Unable to find MIA 2.2

Source: miaviewit Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, miaviewit fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803049: barry: FTBFS: error: call of overloaded 'mem_fn(void (XmlNodeMapping::*)(std::ostream&) const)' is ambiguous

Source: barry Version: 0.18.5-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, barry fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Trying to fix random_buildpath_by_octave

Hi Rafael, On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:09:54PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > I am trying to fix the issue identified as random_buildpath_by_octave [1], > which affects several packages maintained by the Debian Octave Group [2]. Thanks for looking into it! > I need to know how the "variation

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803051: cpl-plugin-naco: please make the build reproducible

Source: cpl-plugin-naco Version: 4.4.0+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803048: moksha.common: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove 'debian/python-moksha.common/usr/lib/python*/dist-packages/moksha.common-*.egg-info/SOURCES.txt': No such file or directory

Source: moksha.common Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, moksha.common fails to build from source in

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Pkg-octave-devel] Trying to fix random_buildpath_by_octave

* Reiner Herrmann [2015-10-26 12:05]: If you look at the page of an affected package [1], you can find a diff of the logs between both build [2]. There you won't find the build id, but the cause of the binary variation: -mkdir (/tmp/oct-RnOahg) -Copying directory (.,

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Pkg-octave-devel] Trying to fix random_buildpath_by_octave

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:42:42PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > Thanks, this is exactly the information that I needed. I think I found a > fix for this issue by making a change in the octave-pkg-dev package [1]. [...] > 1. >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [PATCH] kbuild: Add support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 22:03 +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 2.10.2015 v 01:15 Ben Hutchings napsal(a): > > As part of the reproducible builds project, the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH > > environment variable has been specified as a project- and > > distribution-independent means to specify a timestamp at

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [PATCH] kbuild: Add support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable

Hi, On Montag, 26. Oktober 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote: > It's aimed at all build tools. For examples, see: > > https://codesearch.debian.net/results/%5C%24SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH%20-path%3Adeb > ian%2F/page_0 > https://codesearch.debian.net/results/getenv%5C%28%22SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH%22% >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#803051: cpl-plugin-naco: please make the build reproducible

> Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that > cpl-plugin-naco could not be built reproducibly. > > The attached patch removes randomness from the build system. Once > applied, cpl-plugin-naco can be built reproducibly using our > reproducible > toolchain. Several

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803064: fte: please make the build reproducible

Source: fte Version: 0.50.2b6-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that fte could not be built

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803067: libmath-base-convert-perl: please make the build reproducible

Source: libmath-base-convert-perl Version: 0.11-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#803064: fte: please make the build reproducible

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:51:56PM +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > - tar cf $(CURDIR)/debian/fte-docs/usr/share/doc/fte/config-example.tar > config > + tar --sort=name -cf > $(CURDIR)/debian/fte-docs/usr/share/doc/fte/config-example.tar config Lunar just reminded me that --sort=name

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803072: qlipper: FTBFS: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'QDataStream' and 'int')

Source: qlipper Version: 5.0.0+20150823-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, qlipper fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803073: metview: FTBFS: error: variable 'QDataStream stream' has initializer but incomplete type

Source: metview Version: 4.5.6-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, metview fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]