Hi,
binutils 2.25-6 (which is long in testing + sid) made the build
reproducible (#774429). In that course that bug was cloned into #781262,
which asks for the ar handler of strip-nondeterminism to be removed.
I'm slightly confused now, but (why) is binutils the only package
benefitting from
Hi Sean,
thanks for caring about reproducible builds and reaching out to us!
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 07:12:32PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> My package ocrmypdf builds reproducibly on my machine. But it fails to
> build at all on the reproducible-builds.org cluster.
that's actually not quite
Source: rapache
Version: 1.2.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
rapache fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: cl-babel
Version: 0.3.0+20091229-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
cl-babel fails to build from source in
Source: c++-annotations
Version: 10.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
c++-annotations fails to build from source in
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 07:58:39AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Do you know of any restrictions on reading and writing files on your
> > cluster?
>
> no. Also: our amd64 and i386 setup are pretty much identical…
>
> > I'm pretty sure that the test suite only tries to read and
> >