[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823797: openclonk: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: openclonk Version: 7.0-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the `€œreproducible builds'€ effort [1], we have noticed

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823803: libint2: FTBFS: build_libint.cc:34:34: fatal error: boost/preprocessor.hpp: No such file or directory

2016-05-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: libint2 Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, libint2 fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823824: asymptote: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: asymptote Version: 2.37.real-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the `€œreproducible builds'€ effort [1], we have

[Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, so dpkg 1.18.7 was uploaded to sid today and Mattia promply rebased our patches on it and uploaded the following changes to our repo: dpkg (1.18.7.0~reproducible0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Jérémy Bobbio ] * Use a single timestamp for ar headers when building a .deb. * Use the common

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Hi. Le 09/05/2016 14:26, Holger Levsen a écrit : > ddce83d dpkg-buildpackage: Preset build timestamp to latest changelog entry > > Are there any other changes needed in dpkg for Reproducible builds of Debian? Maybe it should be good to also have (to be merged with ddce83d) if (!

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Alexis Bienvenüe wrote: > Maybe it should be good to also have (to be merged with ddce83d) > > if (! exists($ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES})) { > $ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES} = 1; > } > > in dpkg-buildpackage (see summary and pointers in >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 07:28:30PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > if (! exists($ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES})) { > > $ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES} = 1; > It actually has reached Debian about a month ago, but just in > Experimental: >

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823874: diffoscope: UnicodeDecodeError

2016-05-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Source: diffoscope Version: 52 Seen on rb.d.n with: - openocd/0.9.0-1 (all suites/archs) - psychtoolbox-3/3.0.12.20160414.dfsg1-1 (unstable/armhf) - publican/4.3.2-1 (all suites/archs) Fri May 6 07:44:58 UTC 2016 - diffoscope 52 will be used to compare the two builds: Traceback (most recent

Re: [Reproducible-builds] bpi0 armhf node disk failure

2016-05-09 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-05-04, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:35:07PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> I think bpi0's SSD may be in a very bad state. It's one of the oldest >> nodes, so it's no huge surprise to see disk failures there... Yup, disk seemed to be in a pretty bad state. It did

[Reproducible-builds] Movement 2017 -invitation and call for abstracts

2016-05-09 Thread movement 2017
If you received this mail by mistake, please http://archeologyseminar2015.com/data/unsubscribe.php?M=1158362=9b60644c4b810d98da10b69c24b09b2d=43=40 me from this list Dear colleagues, I am honored to invite you to attend the world conference on Movement sponsored, in part, by the Harvard

Re: [Reproducible-builds] bpi0 armhf node disk failure

2016-05-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Vagrant, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:32:24PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Reinstalled with a new SSD (which has considerably more space for > wear-levelling). > Ready for the jenkins setup scripts to be run on it! cool! installation in progress, should be back building packages rather

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#823879: allegro4.4: please make the build reproducible (locale)

2016-05-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Source: allegro4.4 Version: 2:4.4.2-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that allegro4.4 could not be built reproducibly [2]: the members of