Source: etsf-io
Version: 1.0.4-1~exp1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
etsf-io fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Source: gtkspell3
Version: 3.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
gtkspell3 fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:47:29AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hello reproducible-builds team
o/
> Please add #824806 to
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/issues/unstable/random_build_path_by_golang_compiler_issue.html
Done.
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/notes.git/commit/
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:16:10PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> could someone more python-savvy than me have a look at this claim that
> our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH example for Python on
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Examples
> is wrong.
>
> The claim is here:
> https:/
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:47:37PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> I'm not a Python expert, but the example looks right to me:
>
> $ export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1234567890
>
> $ date -u -d @$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
> Fri Feb 13 23:31:30 UTC 2009
>
> $ python
> >>> import os, time, datetime
> >>> datetime
Le 20/05/2016 22:47, Reiner Herrmann a écrit :
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:16:10PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>> could someone more python-savvy than me have a look at this claim that
>> our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH example for Python on
>> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Ex
