Source: scalapack-doc
Version: 1.5-10
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
scalapack-doc fails to build from source in unstable/amd64
Source: golang-github-miekg-pkcs11
Version: 0.0~git20160412.0.994d290-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we no
Package: src:gimp
Version: 2.8.16-2
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
This package currently fails to build in stretch:
[...]
ranlib libapp.a
libtoo
Package: src:knot
Version: 2.2.1-1
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
This package currently fails to build in stretch:
[...]
make -C ./_build/latex
Package: src:pdal
Version: 1.2.0-2
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
This package currently fails to build in stretch:
[...]
Running Sphinx v1.4.4
m
Package: src:sfepy
Version: 2016.2-1
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
This package currently fails to build in stretch:
[...]
make[3]: Entering dir
Source: libconfig-model-itself-perl
Version: 2.004-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
libconfig-model-itself-perl fails to build
Hi,
pyrit does not build reproducibly on i386. The most obvious culprit is
here [1]:
ABS·build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu_sse2.o
vs
ABS·build/temp.linux-i686-2.7/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu_sse2.o
Looking at the build log, this was generated by a simple invocation of
"py
Hi,
Christian Kastner wrote:
> ABS·build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu_sse2.o
> vs
> ABS·build/temp.linux-i686-2.7/cpyrit/_cpyrit_cpu_sse2.o
>
> Looking at the build log, this was generated by a simple invocation of
> "python setup.py build".
>
> The only explanati
FYI: The status of the reprotest source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Source: python-bioblend
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
python-bioblend fails to build from source in unstable/
Source: cc
Version: 2.9.0-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that cc
could not be built re
reprotest 0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-02
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
812054: lzop: FTBFS with GCC 6: failed the ACC conformance test
812278: musl: FTBFS with GCC 6: musl-tools missing files
___
Reproduci
Hi *,
im not sure from reading the information in the wiki, about
reproducibility of an debian install.
>From this page https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleInstalls I conclude,
that reproducible installs of debian are not possible at the moment,
right? I can only have reproducible packages on an
14 matches
Mail list logo