Re: [Reproducible-builds] New default -fdebug-prefix-map build flag for dpkg

Hi! On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 11:06:32 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:57:01AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > As part of the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we would like to enable > > a new default build flag from the reproducible/fixdebugpath feature > > area in order to

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833282: reprotest: please add a manpage for reprotest

Package: reprotest Version: 0.2 Severity: normal Thanks for writing reprotest! it would be great to have a manual page for the executable, since that's where many users look for documentation. it would also clear up this lintian warning: W: reprotest: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/reprotest

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833284: reprotest: please add a "buildpath" variation to reprotest

Package: reprotest Version: 0.2 Severity: normal The list of variations supported by reprotest doesn't appear to include changing the build path. We should be able to generate identical output regardless of where in the filesystem the build takes place, so supporting this variation would be a

[Reproducible-builds] From srebuild sbuild-wrapper to debrebuild

Hi, On Mon, 09 May 2016 21:07:40 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > The main disadvantage of the current srebuild implementation is, that it will > only make use of a single snapshot.d.o timestamp. This makes it impossible to > reproduce situations where packages are not built in

[Reproducible-builds] Reproducible patches for libisoburn and libisofs

[Please keep myself and reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org in CC] Hey, Thomas Schmitt impressed upon me to send my work in progress patches to make reproducible ISO images. I'm not 100% convinced by them all but I guess it would be good to throw them over-the-wall and see what you guys

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Moving towards buildinfo on the archive network

On 2016-07-25, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > I propose instead a Buildinfo.xz (or gz or whatever) file, which is > single text file with containing all of the buildinfo information that > corresponds to the Packages list. What is lost by this approach are the > OpenPGP signatures that .buildinfo

[Reproducible-builds] diffoscope 56 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 55 Current version: 56 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833305: jacktrip: FTBFS: RtAudioInterface.h:41:21: fatal error: RtAudio.h: No such file or directory

Source: jacktrip Version: 1.1~repack-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, This might be the same as #828951, but jacktrip fails to

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#833304: nageru: FTBFS: quicksync_encoder.cpp:996:15: error: 'close' was not declared in this scope

Source: nageru Version: 1.3.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, nageru fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]