Bug#835641: diffoscope: traceback when comparing dangling symlink to directory

Here's a patch to prevent the traceback. It just detects the general situation (comparing a directory with something else) and bails with a more helpful message when they're incompatible. I checked what diff does, and it does something slightly more nuanced: if you compare directory D against

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 835641 +patch Bug #835641 [diffoscope] diffoscope: traceback when comparing dangling symlink to directory Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 835641:

Bug#849425: diffoscope: test_openssh_pub_key.test_diff fails on jessie after ssh-keygen output format change

Source: diffoscope Version: git as of 011987f Severity: minor Tags: upstream On jessie, test_openssh_pub_key.test_diff fails like this: === FAILURES === __ test_diff

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

Holger Levsen wrote: > > The --profile flag is new in diffoscope 65. > > yes, and? it's not being used on t.r-b.o…?!! What is "it" here? If referring to the flag then yes, it's not being used - that's the intention of this patch set. If it refers to diffoscope >= 65 then I am not actually sure

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:44:50PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available. > > Updated patch attached now that diffoscope 65 is in unstable. > > (From an IRC conversation I am working under the assumption that

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:30:06PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > The previous patch I mailed did a version check before injecting this flag so > it did not break. On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:17:27PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > The --profile flag is new in diffoscope 65. yes, and? it's not being

Re: [diffoscope] 01/01: Use js-beautify as JavaScript code beautifier for .js files

Hey, thanks for this! A question - do you consider #836786 closed by this patch, or is there still more work to be done on it? (#836786 - diffoscope: Differences between long lines are missing in HTML format") X Emanuel Bronshtein: > Sure, here is the test: >

Bug#849411: diffoscope: HTML markup warnings/errors

Source: diffoscope Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, W3 validator report several errors/warnings for diffoscope output, for example: https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/dbd/unstable/amd64/monotone_1.1-9.diffoscope.html

Bug#836786: JavaScript beautifier added

js-beautify is used as JavaScript code beautifier from commit: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?=002f05444cc0a238d8e617b31dabef4111b4ecd2 which fix the above examples, but there are more results that have partial results in lines, such as: in attribute inside

Re: [diffoscope] 01/01: Use js-beautify as JavaScript code beautifier for .js files

No, it's a partial fix, see my replay in #836786 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836786#10   -Emanuel Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 at 8:20 PM From: "Ximin Luo" To: "Emanuel Bronshtein" , "Mattia Rizzolo" Cc: 

Re: Please review draft for week 87's blog post

Ximin Luo: > https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/87/ > > Late one this week, forgot about it because of the summit. > ^ um, ignore that, oversight in copy-paste. ^_^;;; X -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE

Please review draft for week 87's blog post

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/87/ Late one this week, forgot about it because of the summit. Feel free to commit fixes directly to drafts/87.mdwn in https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/ I will publish this in 48 hours, to give some time for the holiday

Bug#848403: diffoscope: FTBFS randomly (Fatal Python error: deallocating None)

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Ximin Luo wrote: > For all you people that already have single-CPU KVM VMs set up, can you > please try to reduce your test cases that still reproduce the bug? > > For example, can you still reproduce it with `debian/rules clean build`? What > about `python3 -m pytest`?

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

Holger Levsen wrote on Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:07:11 +: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:44:50PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > > > Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available. > > > > Updated patch attached now that diffoscope 65 is in unstable. > > >

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

Holger Levsen wrote: > > Updated patch attached now that diffoscope 65 is in unstable. > > > > (From an IRC conversation I am working under the assumption that diffoscope > > from unstable is used even when comparing build results from testing.) > > while this is true (on t.r-b.o) I wonder why

Bug#849391: strip-nondeterminism: autopkgtest failures

tags 849391 + pending thanks Thanks for the report. I've fixed this in: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/strip-nondeterminism.git/commit/?h=debian=81d06905acb35b7a8681ff2e9bf29087cae5414e Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org /

Processed: Re: strip-nondeterminism: autopkgtest failures

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 849391 + pending Bug #849391 [src:strip-nondeterminism] strip-nondeterminism: autopkgtest failures Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 849391:

Bug#849403: diffoscope: Improvesupport for Android apps

Source: diffoscope Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, 1. Better handle .dex files currently enjarify tool is used in order to transform .dex file to .jar, this tool can fail (as probably any decompiler) for example: Command `enjarify -o /tmp/tmpdp3fttiq_diffoscope/classes.jar

Bug#849407: diffoscope: Failures/Errors/Warnings in readelf/objdump usages

Source: diffoscope Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, readelf/objdump return errors/warnings and sometimes fails, examples: 1. objdump: can't disassemble for architecture UNKNOWN! 1.1 objdump: section '.plt' mentioned in a -j option, but not found in any input file

Bug#849391: strip-nondeterminism: autopkgtest failures

source: strip-nondeterminism version: 0.029-1 severity: important from https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/s/strip-nondeterminism/20161226_100743.autopkgtest.log.gz 8<-- 1..2 not ok 1 - bin/dh_strip_nondeterminism --help returns 127 # Failed test

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 03:26:54PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I still wonder :) Do you plan to use --profile on t.r-b.o or? > Yes; that's the entire point of this thread! :p I see, thanks. -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#849395: diffoscope: Improve support for comparing images

Source: diffoscope Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, 1. compare image metadata (EXIF / XMP / size / etc..) for various images formats, can be done with following tools: exiftool - http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ - https://packages.debian.org/sid/libimage-exiftool-perl

Bug#849386: diffoscope: Improve Java support (use decompilers by default and javap as fallback)

Source: diffoscope Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Currently javap is used for .class files, for example: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/diffoscope-results/velocity.html

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 01:01:34PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Holger Levsen wrote: > > > > The --profile flag is new in diffoscope 65. > > > > yes, and? it's not being used on t.r-b.o…?!! > > What is "it" here? If referring to the flag then yes, it's not being > used - that's the intention of

Re: [PATCH] Reproducible debian: Log diffoscope profiling info if available.

Holger Levsen wrote: > I still wonder :) Do you plan to use --profile on t.r-b.o or? Yes; that's the entire point of this thread! :p Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#848403: diffoscope: FTBFS randomly (Fatal Python error: deallocating None)

Santiago Vila wrote: > If I do "python3 -m pytest" afterwards this is what it's shown: […] > Note: This is still diffoscope_63 in stretch, not sure if I should > better try the version in unstable and forget completely about this > version. Please do so; the icc tests were fixed later and there

Bug#849403: diffoscope: Improvesupport for Android apps

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 07:19:17PM +0200, Emanuel Bronshtein wrote: > 2. Support parsing android resources not in APK file > > Support for some Android files (such as: AndroidManifest.xml & > resources.arsc) was added in: >

Bug#848403: diffoscope: FTBFS randomly (Fatal Python error: deallocating None)

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 07:37:55PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > > > If I do "python3 -m pytest" afterwards this is what it's shown: > […] > > Note: This is still diffoscope_63 in stretch, not sure if I should > > better try the version in unstable and forget completely about

Bug#848403: diffoscope: FTBFS randomly (Fatal Python error: deallocating None)

Hi. I have built version 66 one hundred times in unstable. The builds were made on 19 different autobuilders. The number of failed builds has been zero. (Previously it failed 10% of the time). If you do not remember what kind of change may have fixed this, then there must be some broken

Bug#848403: diffoscope: FTBFS randomly (Fatal Python error: deallocating None)

I should add, I also had failures with diffoscope version 64 and older, but no failures on newer versions. It seems likely that one of the changes fixed this bug as a side effect, but I cannot yet tell which one. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list