On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:23:59AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:07:58PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > > I only have a very large XUL library... you probably don't want that.
> >
> > Probably not for the testsuite (!) but if you could make it available it
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:07:58PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> > I only have a very large XUL library... you probably don't want that.
>
> Probably not for the testsuite (!) but if you could make it available it
> would help with a fix anyway...
The two builds I was comparing:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:50:05PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> > In some cases, otool can fail with:
> >
> > can't create x86_64 llvm disassembler
>
> Do you happen to have example files you could point to or upload? Not
> essential of course, but would be much easier and
Hi Mike,
> In some cases, otool can fail with:
>
> can't create x86_64 llvm disassembler
Do you happen to have example files you could point to or upload? Not
essential of course, but would be much easier and reliable to write a
fix with an addition to the testsuite armed with them...
>
Package: diffoscope
Version: 90
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
In some cases, otool can fail with:
can't create x86_64 llvm disassembler
(where x86_64 may be another platform, and where the message is usually
preceded by the file path name and "(__TEXT,__text) section", well, in
fact,
Hi Mike,
> I only have a very large XUL library... you probably don't want that.
Probably not for the testsuite (!) but if you could make it available it
would help with a fix anyway...
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org /
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:36:02AM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > The two builds I was comparing:
>
> […]
>
> Thanks for sending this over. For some reason, I completely failed to
> realise that I would need access to otool to make use of these, and
> this is not in Debian
Mike Hommey wrote:
> The two builds I was comparing:
[…]
Thanks for sending this over. For some reason, I completely failed to
realise that I would need access to otool to make use of these, and
this is not in Debian ;)
Can you run some commands for me? In particular, is it sufficient to
tags 886736 + pending
thanks
Cool. Should be fixed in Git...
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=59dc18184ea11f3efc0236acb914e6355e8493ad
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
