Le mardi 25 août 2015 à 12:20 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> On 08/25/2015 11:55 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2015-08-25, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 07/28/2015 05:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialko
Le jeudi 13 août 2015 à 18:08 +1200, Chris Packham a écrit :
> Along with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to recreate a
> build with a specific date timestamp. This allows the verification of
> source supplied with a pre-compiled binary.
>
> If SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is supplied SOURCE_DAT
: Bin Meng
> Tested-by: Paul Kocialkowski
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - None
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Collect some tested-by tags
> - Remove reference to f3f431a71272 in the commit message
> - Drop Ccs that were erroneously added when submitting v1, remaining
Le mercredi 26 août 2015 à 21:08 +1200, Chris Packham a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Le jeudi 13 août 2015 à 18:08 +1200, Chris Packham a écrit :
> >> Along with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to recreate a
> >>
Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 10:13 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds requires the GNU
> variant of date. Respect this and search it, error on missing GNU date.
Well, IMHO we shouldn't check for GNU date but for the extensions it
implements. Thos
Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 11:30 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH mechanism for reproducible builds require some date
> with -u and -d switch to print the date string of another time. In other
> words it requires some date that behaves like the GNU date.
>
> Respect this and
Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 15:52 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> On 08/27/2015 03:03 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 11:30 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
>
>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> * check for '-u' and '
Le jeudi 24 septembre 2015 à 09:05 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit :
> On 2015-07-26, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are
> > defined
> > at build-time have to be somewhat eliminated. The SOURCE_DATE_E
Le mercredi 30 septembre 2015 à 08:50 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit :
> On 2015-09-28, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > What do you think? Please let me know if I'm wrong.
>
> This patch on top of 2015.10-rc4 seems to resolve the issue for me:
>
> Index: u-
#define U_BOOT_TZ "NOTZ"')
> +endef
> +else
> define filechk_timestamp.h
> (LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_DATE "%b %d %C%y"'; \
> LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_TIME "%T"'; \
> LC_ALL=C date +'#define U_BOOT_
Le samedi 13 juin 2015 à 11:10 +0200, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks for contacting us!
>
> On Freitag, 12. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > I think a bit more is needed to get truly reproducible builds in U-Boot,
> > but this is a first good s
> sorry for the late reply.
No problem, I haven't kept you or the list posted on this either.
I got a chance to discuss the issue with Lunar during RMLL 2015 and we
came up with a nice way of doing things, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.
> On Samstag, 13. Juni 2015, Paul Kocialk
from today).
Now that I think about it, maybe virtualisation would require simply too
many VMs to setup.
Either way, we can always try to add a toolchain build script to U-Boot.
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Replicant developer
Replicant is a fully free Android distribution running on several
de
-10 liner, not
> the fancy one with variations, rebuilds and running debbindiff. Just the
> above
> "4 lines in working" - (those 4 lines dont work cause the variables are not
> defined...)
I could do that, but we have to figure out the toolchain issue first, I
suppose
be
built reproducibly. This is the case for e.g. sunxi devices.
However, some other devices might need some more tweaks, especially regarding
the image generation tools.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski
---
Makefile | 7 ---
tools/default_image.c | 21 -
2
?
I think adding a config option adds all sorts of unnecessary
complications. SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is sufficient for what we want.
Thanks a lot for your work, it has been a great base for the patch I
just sent: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/497577/
Feel free to add your signed-off-by line since
Le lundi 20 juillet 2015 à 10:01 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski a écrit :
> In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are defined
> at build-time have to be somewhat eliminated. The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
> environment
> variable allows setting a fixed value for thos
o
> > spot other areas that make the binaries not reproducible. However, I
> > doubt this patch will evolve much and other fixes should be sent in
> > subsequent patches.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski
> >> ---
> >> Makefile
Le lundi 20 juillet 2015 à 07:45 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian a écrit :
> On 2015-07-20, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are
> > defined
> > at build-time have to be somewhat eliminated. The SOURCE_DATE_E
Le lundi 20 juillet 2015 à 17:13 +0200, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
> Hello Paul,
>
> Am 20.07.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Paul Kocialkowski:
> >> I am just on the jump into my holidays, so I have not yet the time
> >> to test it ... I want to try it for all builds with the sc
be
built reproducibly. This is the case for e.g. sunxi devices.
However, some other devices might need some more tweaks, especially regarding
the image generation tools.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski
---
Makefile | 7 ---
README| 12
tools
Le lundi 20 juillet 2015 à 17:13 +0200, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
> Hello Paul,
>
> Am 20.07.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Paul Kocialkowski:
> >> I am just on the jump into my holidays, so I have not yet the time
> >> to test it ... I want to try it for all builds with the sc
opinion about
whether UTC should be default. I was also going to introduce a patch
like yours later. For the record, UTC is default for Coreboot's
timestamps.
Thus, please remove that line.
Otherwise, this is:
Tested-By: Paul Kocialkowski
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
> ---
> Hop
Le samedi 01 août 2015 à 22:32 +1200, Chris Packham a écrit :
> Along with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH SOURCE_DATE_TZ can be used to recreate a
> build with a specific date timestamp. This allows the verification of
> source supplied with a pre-compiled binary.
>
> If SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is supplied SOURCE_DA
24 matches
Mail list logo
