Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

reassign -1 ftp.debian.org thanks On 2018-04-12 22:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2018-04-12 19:41, Holger Levsen wrote: control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) # if not, please

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On 2018-04-12 19:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy > no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" > # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) > # if not, please fixup? > #thanks That can't be done on the wanna-build side, uploads to

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.3.0-21+really16.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/python-setuptools_39.0.1-1.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 12/04/18 21:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > > control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy > > no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" > > # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) > > # if not,

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) # if not, please fixup? #thanks -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:10:37PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Please, see my reply at . This is > really a fundamental problem with binNMUs+multiarch-refcounting or how > they are being issued. :) FWIW I totally agree with what you wrote there, just that I

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

Control: severity -1 wishlist On 04/12/2018 02:10 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: Control: reassign -1 buildd.debian.org Hi! On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 17:43:58 +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: On Friday, 30 March 2018 15:02:31 CEST Chris Lamb wrote: [

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

Control: reassign -1 buildd.debian.org Hi! On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 17:43:58 +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > On Friday, 30 March 2018 15:02:31 CEST Chris Lamb wrote: > > [ https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html ] > > On Friday, 30 March 2018 20:15:33 CEST Sven Joachim

Край на меките и чупливи нокти!

MICRO CELL е заздравител за нокти №1 в Германия, Норвегия и Швеция. Специална програма за грижа за ноктите и ръцете.  MICRO CELL възстановява протеиновата молекула във всички пластове на нокътя, вместо да го запечатва, консервира.- възстановява увредените и витализира слабите клетки-

Re: Please review the draft for week 154's blog post

Chris Lamb, wrote: > Please review the draft for week 154's blog post: This has now been published. Thanks to all who contributed :) Please share the following URL: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/154/ … or the following Tweet if you do that sort of thing:

Please review the draft for week 154's blog post

gHi all, Please review the draft for week 154's blog post: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/154/ Feel free to commit any changes directly to drafts/154.mdwn in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/ I am very happy to reword and/or rework prior to

Processed: Re: Bug#894832: CVE-2018-1002150

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://pagure.io/koji/issue/850 Bug #894832 [src:koji] CVE-2018-1002150 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://pagure.io/koji/issue/850'. -- 894832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#894832: CVE-2018-1002150

Control: forwarded -1 https://pagure.io/koji/issue/850 Hi There is some further information on that issue in the upstrema bug at https://pagure.io/koji/issue/850 and the https://docs.pagure.org/koji/CVE-2018-1002150/ . Versions prior to 1.12.0 are not vulnerable because they do not have the

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > So, during compilation: > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries > because it breaks Multi-Arch:same on bin-nmu. > > During dpkg-deb (: > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must *not* ignore bin-nmu changelog entries >

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Friday, 30 March 2018 15:02:31 CEST Chris Lamb wrote: > [ https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html ] On Friday, 30 March 2018 20:15:33 CEST Sven Joachim wrote: > [ https://bugs.debian.org/843773 ] Thanks a lot guys for pointing out that issue! Basically, when doing

Re: distributing .buildinfo files (Re: Bad interaction between pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master)

On 9/3/17 11:40 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2017-09-02 23:48, Holger Levsen wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:23:29PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >>> > Not yet.  We people from the reproducible team couldn't find a way to >>> > usefully talk to ftp-masters people, whom never replied to any of

Bug#894832: CVE-2018-1002150

Source: koji Severity: grave Tags: security http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/04/04/1 Cheers, Moritz ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Fwd: [migration of alioth list reproducible-commits]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:55:35PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > So, I'm going to ask them to skip our list, and then in the next weeks > work on moving stuff to rb-commits@ instead (this will also include > moving the subscribers once the mails moved). FYI, that's now done. I: * subscribed all

diffoscope 93 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 92 Current version: 93 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

Re: [rb-general] Please review the draft for week 153's blog post

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 153's blog post: Thanks to everyone who contributed. This is now live here: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/153/ If you are into that kind of thing, please retweet:

Повдигащ силиконов сутиен без презрамки

Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://217.79.38.70/emailmarketer/display.php?M=189895=3a2de8a1394aa8e03c3cfbed83851399=6=4=2 To stop receiving these

Маркер - Заличител на драскотините по колата

Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://91.238.251.219/emailmarketer/display.php?M=187628=7128f0c14165ede32dcbf4f6414f2916=5=4=1 To stop receiving these

Please review the draft for week 153's blog post

Hi all, Please review the draft for week 153's blog post: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/153/ Feel free to commit any changes directly to drafts/153.mdwn in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/ I am very happy to reword and/or rework prior to

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On 2018-03-30 20:15, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2018-03-30 15:02 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: [adding 894441@ to CC] Hi Jean-Michel, Filled as #894441 https://bugs.debian.org/894441 Thanks for this. I was just briefly wondering whether this is related to:

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On 2018-03-30 15:02 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > [adding 894441@ to CC] > > Hi Jean-Michel, > >> Filled as #894441 >> https://bugs.debian.org/894441 > > Thanks for this. I was just briefly wondering whether this is related to: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html It

OSHA Training Sign up - March 2018

Complete your OSHA qualification & receive your OSHA DOL wallet card. Visit Website OSHA Outreach FAQ's Contact us OSHA Training SAVE 20% With Promo Code RES20 OSHA 10 hour Construction Our course is designed to teach an entry level construction worker about workplace...read more Enroll Now OSHA

dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.19.0.5 Severity: important Justification: Make unrelated packages violate multi-arch specs Dear Maintainer, When doing bin-nmu, each architecture gets its own d/changelog entry like: rrdtool (1.7.0-1+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes * Binary-only

Bug#894391: marked as done (strip-nondeterminism: fix testsuite [patch])

Your message dated Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:24:59 +0200 with message-id <663f4229-6851-9e33-2433-7e01d72f9...@debian.org> and subject line Re: strip-nondeterminism: fix testsuite [patch] has caused the Debian Bug report #894391, regarding strip-nondeterminism: fix testsuite [patch] to be marked as

Processed: Re: strip-nondeterminism: fix testsuite [patch]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 894391 + pending Bug #894391 [src:strip-nondeterminism] strip-nondeterminism: fix testsuite [patch] Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 894391:

Bug#893037: Add support for diffing docker-format containers

I poked a bit at how docker's overlay2 driver stores the layers and came up with this temporary hack script #!/bin/sh set -u set -e if [ $# -lt 2 ]; then echo usage: $0 before after exit 1 fi before="$1" after="$2" bfs=$(docker inspect -f '{{ .GraphDriver.Data.UpperDir }}' "$before")

Bug#894391: strip-nondeterminism: fix testsuite [patch]

Source: strip-nondeterminism Version: 0.040-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hello, the testsuite is now broken, because debhelper assumes a debian directory available during the perl import code e.g. "require Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Lib" so, copying the debian directory to the testsuite path

Accepted diffoscope 93 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:03:03 +0100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source all Version: 93 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

diffoscope_93_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:03:03 +0100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source all Version: 93 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

Processing of diffoscope_93_amd64.changes

diffoscope_93_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_93.dsc diffoscope_93.tar.xz diffoscope_93_all.deb diffoscope_93_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

diffoscope 92 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 91 Current version: 92 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

Bug#893037: Add support for diffing docker-format containers

Juliana wrote: > AFAIK, docker /images/ can be exported to tarballs. Not sure how human > readable they are, but diffoscope can definitely work. (:> Indeed that would definitely work. However, the "REPL" for someone doing this would inevitably involve someone scripting the export of two images

Bug#859103: strip-nondeterminism: does not replace all timestamps in zip archives

Package: strip-nondeterminism Version: 0.034-1 Followup-For: Bug #859103 This is especially annoying because the "local extra field" includes the file *access* time: $ rm -f foo 1.zip 2.zip $ touch -d 2015-01-01 foo $ zip 1.zip foo $ zip 2.zip foo $ strip-nondeterminism 1.zip

Re: [rb-general] Please review the draft for week 152's blog post

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 152's blog post: Thanks to all who contributed.. I've published this here: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/152/ Or, if you are into that kind of thing, please retweet:

Caixa de correio excedida

Sua conta de caixa de correio foi excedida limite de cota de envio de mensagem hoje, atualize e valide sua conta de e-mail para que você possa enviar e receber mensagem. Clique no link admin abaixo para validar sua conta de e-mail ou seu e-mail será bloco temporário para enviar mais mensagens.

Hello

-- Hello, Donation of $2M To You... Contact ( maviswanczyk6...@gmail.com) for more Info, Please do not ignore, this is the third time i'm sending this. WATCH STORY: https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=a-WWMvlQBEU Regard Mavis Wanczyk___

Re: Making schleuder build reproducibly

Hi all, On 18-03-13 15:20:48, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 17-10-30 18:21:39, Georg Faerber wrote: > > On 17-06-15 21:19:12, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > I really would like to make the build of schleuder, a gpg enabled > > > mailing list, reproducible. However, I'm a bit lost on my own, > > > that's

diffoscope is marked for autoremoval from testing

diffoscope 91 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-04-30 It is affected by these RC bugs: 893183: diffoscope: diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9 ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

reprotest is marked for autoremoval from testing

reprotest 0.7.7 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-04-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 893183: diffoscope: diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9 ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

On 23.03.2018 00:08, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 893702 - patch > thanks > > Hi Matthias, > >> pdftk still still depends on GCJ, and is likely to be removed when gcj is >> removed. Please stop build-depending on pdftk. > > We build-depend on pdftk because we actually use it to compare files, > so

Bug#884095: flag to force file types

Chris Lamb: > Hi Hans, > >> It would be literally impossible to auto-detect since a Janus APK is >> both a valid DEX file (starting with the bytes "dex") and […] > > Oh dear, I got a little lost in the weeds of Janus/APK/ZIP here.. > > Could you excuse my pedanticness and ask for direct links

Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

Control: affects 892539 diffoscope On 2018-03-21, Matthias Klose wrote: > pdftk still still depends on GCJ, and is likely to be removed when gcj is > removed. Please stop build-depending on pdftk. FWIW, there's a reference to a fork of pdftk that doesn't require gcj:

Bug#893037: Add support for diffing docker-format containers

Hi Jonathan and Lamby, AFAIK, docker /images/ can be exported to tarballs. Not sure how human readable they are, but diffoscope can definitely work. (: On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:52:40 + Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 893037 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Jonathan, > > Thank you very

Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

control: severity -1 important thanks On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 08:38:31PM +0800, Matthias Klose wrote: > pdftk still still depends on GCJ, and is likely to be removed when gcj is > removed. Please stop build-depending on pdftk. thanks for warning us, Matthias! I'm lowering the severity until gcj

Processed: Re: Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #893702 [src:diffoscope] Please stop build-depending on pdftk Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 893702: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893702 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 893702 - patch Bug #893702 [src:diffoscope] Please stop build-depending on pdftk Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 893702:

Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

tags 893702 - patch thanks Hi Matthias, > pdftk still still depends on GCJ, and is likely to be removed when gcj is > removed. Please stop build-depending on pdftk. We build-depend on pdftk because we actually use it to compare files, so unfortunately simply dropping it from the Build-Depends

Bug#884095: flag to force file types

Hi Hans, > It would be literally impossible to auto-detect since a Janus APK is > both a valid DEX file (starting with the bytes "dex") and […] Oh dear, I got a little lost in the weeds of Janus/APK/ZIP here.. Could you excuse my pedanticness and ask for direct links to files, what you are

Bug#893802: marked as done (diffoscope: missing Depends: python3-distutils)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:15:26 + with message-id <1521731726.2099249.1312414904.6111e...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: Bug#893802: diffoscope: missing Depends: python3-distutils has caused the Debian Bug report #893802, regarding diffoscope: missing Depends:

Bug#893324: marked as done (diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#893324: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #893324, regarding diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options to be marked as done. This

Bug#893443: marked as done (diffoscope: please make it easier to see supported file formats)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#893443: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #893443, regarding diffoscope: please make it easier to see supported file formats to be marked as done.

Bug#891363: marked as done (Diffoscope crashes when cleaning non-writeable temporary files/dirs)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891363: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #891363, regarding Diffoscope crashes when cleaning non-writeable temporary files/dirs to be marked as done.

Bug#893183: marked as done (diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#893183: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #893183, regarding diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#892240: marked as done (diffoscope: crashes comparing directories with python3-xattr installed)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#892240: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #892240, regarding diffoscope: crashes comparing directories with python3-xattr installed to be marked as

Bug#891903: marked as done (diffoscope: "AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'decode'" when processing ELF binary)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#891903: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #891903, regarding diffoscope: "AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'decode'" when processing ELF

Bug#893311: marked as done (diffoscope: Please add support for comparing gnumeric spreadsheets)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#893311: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #893311, regarding diffoscope: Please add support for comparing gnumeric spreadsheets to be marked as done.

Bug#890904: marked as done (diffoscope does not show classes.dex diff)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#890904: fixed in diffoscope 92 has caused the Debian Bug report #890904, regarding diffoscope does not show classes.dex diff to be marked as done. This means that you

Accepted diffoscope 92 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:28:44 -0400 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Built-For-Profiles: nocheck Architecture: source all Version: 92 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

diffoscope_92_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:28:44 -0400 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Built-For-Profiles: nocheck Architecture: source all Version: 92 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

Bug#893802: diffoscope: missing Depends: python3-distutils

Package: diffoscope Version: 91 Severity: serious User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap In a fresh sid debootstrap, after apt-get install --no-install-recommends diffoscope, you get: $ diffoscope --help Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/diffoscope", line 33, in

Processing of diffoscope_92_amd64.changes

diffoscope_92_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_92.dsc diffoscope_92.tar.xz diffoscope_92_all.deb diffoscope_92_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#884095: flag to force file types

Chris Lamb: > Hi Hans! > >>> Have we really exhausted the detection route for this? :) >> >> I think the detection route has been exhausted. It seems that no one >> wants to do what it takes to reliably detect APKs. > > I'm sorry you think so and, with the greatest of respect, I'm not > sure

Великден в Банско в Клуб Хотел - Мурите! Разгледайте нашите специални предложения!

*|MC_PREVIEW_TEXT|*      Murite Club Hotel               * * * *       • НАСТАНЯВАНЕ •  РЕСТОРАНТ • SPA ЦЕНТЪР • СПЕЦИАЛНИ ОФЕРТИ • ГАЛЕРИЯ • ХОТЕЛЪТ • ЦЕНАТА ВКЛЮЧВА: 

Bug#884095: flag to force file types

Hi Hans! > > Have we really exhausted the detection route for this? :) > > I think the detection route has been exhausted. It seems that no one > wants to do what it takes to reliably detect APKs. I'm sorry you think so and, with the greatest of respect, I'm not sure this is entirely

Bug#884095: flag to force file types

Chris Lamb: > severity 884095 wishlist > thanks > > Hi hc, > >> Something like --force=apk would solve both. > > So, I'm a little nervous about introducing such a directive. > > This is primarily in terms that diffoscope should really just Do The > Right Thing by default in all cases and not

Bug#893702: Please stop build-depending on pdftk

Package: src:diffoscope Version: 91 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster patch pdftk still still depends on GCJ, and is likely to be removed when gcj is removed. Please stop build-depending on pdftk. patch at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/361431924/diffoscope_91build1_91ubuntu1.diff.gz

Re: Please review the draft for week 151's blog post

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 151's blog post: Published at: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/151/ Thanks all! Please RT/like the following tweet if you're into that sort of thing: https://twitter.com/ReproBuilds/status/976187950114525184 Best

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

tags 893324 + pending thanks > sounds good to me. Applied in Git, thanks all! https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=0da118a131f95811c158c5d47e4d620d01a233ea Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org /

Processed: Re: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 893324 + pending Bug #893324 [diffoscope] diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #893324 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Charity Project

I have a mission for you worth $100,000,000.00 ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:20:45AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > How about removing the "/ignore" and adding sentences like these: > > Use this option to ignore files based on their names. > Use this option to disable commands that use a lot of resources. > Use this option to ignore permissions,

Подарете си една незабравима почивка с нашите All Inclusive оферти!

Hi,You have an opportunity to seize riches and glory foryourself, today. You won't get another shot:This is how: >> Download Yours Now See you inside! Unsubscribe me from this list

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 01:26:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > $ diffoscope --no-progress --exclude-directory-metadata a b > Lets turn this into a bug about that instead. I would suggest replacing > "Exclude" with "Exclude/ignore" within the docs about the options that > exclude some parts of

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

Dear Paul, > Yep. I realised I had commit access so I took the liberty of adding it > to all the other --exclude-* option documentation too. Hope that is OK. Perfect, thanks! :) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 15:47 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Please check out the latest commit, I added 'ignore' to help grepping > through the manpage. Hopefully that's enough to cover your wish :) Yep. I realised I had commit access so I took the liberty of adding it to all the other

Bug#893443: diffoscope: please make it easier to see supported file formats

tags 893443 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=1375ec5bc1f653c4588ac503f45a8c2fcb87ab58 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#893443: diffoscope: please make it easier to see supported file formats

Package: diffoscope Version: 91 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: Jonathan Dowland Hi, < Jon> lamby, https://diffoscope.org/ should link to or provide (more easily) a list of supported archive types Great idea. :) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' :

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

Control: tag -1 pending On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 01:26:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Lets turn this into a bug about that instead. I would suggest replacing > "Exclude" with "Exclude/ignore" within the docs about the options that > exclude some parts of the diffoscope output. Please check out

Processed: Re: Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #893324 [diffoscope] diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options Added tag(s) pending. -- 893324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893324 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: pocl has reproducible test result: FTBFS

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:10:45AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-opencl-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > lists pocl as FTBFS from reproducible test results ... which is

Please review the draft for week 151's blog post

Hi all, Please review the draft for week 151's blog post: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/151/ Feel free to commit any changes directly to drafts/151.mdwn in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/ I am very happy to reword and/or rework prior to

Re: pocl has reproducible test result: FTBFS

Hi Andreas, thanks for reaching out! On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-opencl-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org > > lists pocl as FTBFS from reproducible test results ... which is correct > (it does FTBFS on

Processed: Re: Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options Bug #893324 [diffoscope] diffoscope: mechanism to ignore changes to file modification dates Changed Bug title to 'diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options' from

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

Control: retitle -1 diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 02:02 +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Does this not already exist? .. > $ diffoscope --no-progress --exclude-directory-metadata a b Ah, woops. I looked at the manual

Bug#893324: diffoscope: mechanism to ignore changes to file modification dates

tags 893324 + moreinfo thanks Hi Paul, > it would be nice to have a way to ignore the modification timestamp. Does this not already exist? $ mkdir a b $ touch a/foo $ sleep 1 $ touch b/foo $ diffoscope --no-progress --exclude-directory-metadata a b $ echo $? 0 Regards, --

Processed: Re: Bug#893324: diffoscope: mechanism to ignore changes to file modification dates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 893324 + moreinfo Bug #893324 [diffoscope] diffoscope: mechanism to ignore changes to file modification dates Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 893324:

Bug#893324: diffoscope: mechanism to ignore changes to file modification dates

Package: diffoscope Version: 91 Severity: wishlist When I am sponsoring packages I sometimes use diffoscope to compare source packages. Often a lot of timestamps have changed but I don't really care about timestamp changes when sponsoring packages, so it would be nice to have a way to ignore the

Bug#893183: diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9

tags 893183 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=41da8b11090d31f209d9737249110efa9f227f42 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Processed: Re: diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 893183 + pending Bug #893183 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 893183:

Processed: Re: diffoscope: Please add support for comparing gnumeric spreadsheets

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 893311 + pending Bug #893311 [diffoscope] diffoscope: Please add support for comparing gnumeric spreadsheets Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 893311:

Bug#893311: diffoscope: Please add support for comparing gnumeric spreadsheets

tags 893311 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=f2d71c1e5a63a94c0cf04a69ac048987f9609978 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#893311: diffoscope: Please add support for comparing gnumeric spreadsheets

Package: diffoscope Version: 91 Severity: wishlist Hi, gnumeric ships with ssdiff(1) a tool to compare two spreadsheets. We could thus fairly easily add support for this file format. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Bug#893183: diffoscope FTBFS with openjdk-9

Source: diffoscope Version: 91 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope.html ... ___ test_diff_javap differences_javap = [] @skip_unless_tool_is_at_least('javap',

Processed: Re: Bug#893037: Add support for diffing docker-format containers

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 893037 + moreinfo Bug #893037 [src:diffoscope] Add support for diffing docker-format containers Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 893037:

Bug#893037: Add support for diffing docker-format containers

tags 893037 + moreinfo thanks Hi Jonathan, Thank you very much for the idea and wishlist bug. > It would be nice if diffoscope could diff against docker containers available > on the local system. Could you briefly elaborate on what you mean here? I have a bunch of directories under

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >