On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 01:32:50 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I guess I have to ask, though: doesn't it seem that having the docs
> > produced according to the current locale is the Right Thing to do? Users
> > have their locale set as it is for a reason, it seems like the production
> > of textua
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:30 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:49:19 +0100
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Currently the encoding of documents generated by DocBook depends on
> > the current locale. Make the output reproducible independently of
> > the locale, by setting the enc
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:40:33 -0400
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I sympathize with Jonathan's general concern here -- if this patchset
> makes it impossible for people to build documentation with (for example)
> their preferred collation order, it would be suboptimal.
>
> On the other hand, this
On Fri 2015-09-11 15:30:59 -0400, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:49:19 +0100
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> Currently the encoding of documents generated by DocBook depends on
>> the current locale. Make the output reproducible independently of
>> the locale, by setting the encoding
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:49:19 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Currently the encoding of documents generated by DocBook depends on
> the current locale. Make the output reproducible independently of
> the locale, by setting the encoding to UTF-8 (LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8) by
> preference, or ASCII (LC_CTYPE=
Currently the encoding of documents generated by DocBook depends on
the current locale. Make the output reproducible independently of
the locale, by setting the encoding to UTF-8 (LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8) by
preference, or ASCII (LC_CTYPE=C) as a fallback.
LC_CTYPE can normally be overridden by LC_ALL,