Re: [Reproducible-builds] CI testbuilds LC_ALL vs. LANG
Andreas Metzler: > If we are aiming for locale agnostic builds we seem to take a > unnecessary work intensive approach by adding > export LC_ALL=C > to dozens (hundreds?) of debian/rules or changing > -sort > +env LC_ALL= sort > instead of simply patching dpkg-buildpackage. Using `dpkg-buildpackage` is not a requirement to build Debian packages. If using `fakeroot debian/rules binary` starts to give different results than running `dpkg-buildpackage`, some maintainers are likely to have bad surprises. Pushing for such a change is much larger than the scope of the reproducible builds effort. Feel free to work on it, though! -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] CI testbuilds LC_ALL vs. LANG
> this will not benefit free software in other contexts as Debian, so > that's why we rather like to see this fixed upstream. It also find packages that are subtly broken, eg. #799871, etc. /lamby ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
