Re: [Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 8: Move forward reproducible builds
Hi, On 07/21/2015 01:06 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of these patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for the difference? I used this fix because it was specified in the description here https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html but could future patches use the latter? I can use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for future patches, and also modify the issue description. Will this be okay for everybody? cheers, akira ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 8: Move forward reproducible builds
On 21/07/15 14:33, Maria Valentina Marin wrote: Hi, On 07/21/2015 01:06 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of these patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for the difference? I used this fix because it was specified in the description here https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html but could future patches use the latter? I can use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for future patches, and also modify the issue description. Will this be okay for everybody? Sounds good to me; note that you have to change the commands to prepend a '@' in front of the variable, like: find -newermt '@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)' touch --date '@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)' X -- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 8: Move forward reproducible builds
Hello, This week I have been working on packages which are marked as affected by not_using_dh_builddeb [1]. Patches were submitted for the following packages: - Package: abook https://bugs.debian.org/792995 - Package: angband https://bugs.debian.org/792994 - Package: argus-client https://bugs.debian.org/792943 - Package: authbind https://bugs.debian.org/792945 - Package: bcron https://bugs.debian.org/792996 - Package: beav https://bugs.debian.org/793000 - Package: blosxom https://bugs.debian.org/793001 - Package: ccze https://bugs.debian.org/792949 - Package: cgilib https://bugs.debian.org/793002 - Package: cgoban https://bugs.debian.org/792993 - Package: checkpw https://bugs.debian.org/793005 - Package: chiark-utils https://bugs.debian.org/792998 - Package: chimera2 https://bugs.debian.org/792949 - Package: console-cyrillic https://bugs.debian.org/792999 - Package: cvs-mailcommit https://bugs.debian.org/792947 - Package: daemontools https://bugs.debian.org/793003 - Package: dbview https://bugs.debian.org/792951 - Package: debdelta https://bugs.debian.org/793004 - Package: dhcpdump https://bugs.debian.org/792951 - Package: dhcping https://bugs.debian.org/792953 - Package: dpatch https://bugs.debian.org/792954 - Package: dput https://bugs.debian.org/792955 - Package: dropbear https://bugs.debian.org/793006 - Package: dtaus https://bugs.debian.org/792958 - Package: elida https://bugs.debian.org/792959 - Package: enemies-of-carlotta https://bugs.debian.org/792961 - Package: erc https://bugs.debian.org/792963 - Package: fast-foward https://bugs.debian.org/792965 - Package: fgetty https://bugs.debian.org/792967 - Package: flowscan https://bugs.debian.org/792969 - Package: fortunes-bg https://bugs.debian.org/792970 - Package: freecdb https://bugs.debian.org/792989 - Package: ftpcopy https://bugs.debian.org/792982 - Package: gerstensaft https://bugs.debian.org/792983 - Package: gpsmanshp https://bugs.debian.org/792991 - Package: integrit https://bugs.debian.org/792984 - Package: ipsvd https://bugs.debian.org/792985 - Package: jargon https://bugs.debian.org/792987 - Package: junior-doc https://bugs.debian.org/792971 - Package: libjama https://bugs.debian.org/792972 - Package: liblip https://bugs.debian.org/792973 - Package: liblockfile https://bugs.debian.org/792974 - Package: libmsv https://bugs.debian.org/792975 - Package: logapp https://bugs.debian.org/792976 - Package: luakit https://bugs.debian.org/792977 - Package: nec https://bugs.debian.org/792978 - Package: runit https://bugs.debian.org/792979 - Package: skalibs https://bugs.debian.org/792990 - Package: tworld https://bugs.debian.org/792980 - Package: uruk https://bugs.debian.org/792986 - Package: wmweather https://bugs.debian.org/792981 - Package: xbs https://bugs.debian.org/792988 Kind Regards, akira [1] https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds