Re: [Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 8: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-21 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Hi,

On 07/21/2015 01:06 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
 Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of 
 these patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for the 
 difference? 

I used this fix because it was specified in the description here
https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html


 but could future patches use the latter? 

I can use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for future patches, and also modify the
issue description.

Will this be okay for everybody?

cheers,
akira

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds


Re: [Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 8: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-21 Thread Ximin Luo
On 21/07/15 14:33, Maria Valentina Marin wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On 07/21/2015 01:06 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
 Sorry in advance if this sounds like nitpicking - I notice that a lot of 
 these patches use BUILD_DATE instead of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. Any reason for 
 the difference? 
 
 I used this fix because it was specified in the description here
 https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html
 
 
 but could future patches use the latter? 
 
 I can use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for future patches, and also modify the
 issue description.
 
 Will this be okay for everybody?
 

Sounds good to me; note that you have to change the commands to prepend a '@' 
in front of the variable, like:

find -newermt '@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)'
touch --date '@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)'

X

-- 
GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 8: Move forward reproducible builds

2015-07-20 Thread Maria Valentina Marin
Hello,

This week I have been working on packages which are marked as affected
by not_using_dh_builddeb [1].

Patches were submitted for the following packages:

- Package: abook
https://bugs.debian.org/792995

- Package: angband
https://bugs.debian.org/792994

- Package: argus-client
https://bugs.debian.org/792943

- Package: authbind
https://bugs.debian.org/792945

- Package: bcron
https://bugs.debian.org/792996

- Package: beav
https://bugs.debian.org/793000

- Package: blosxom
https://bugs.debian.org/793001

- Package: ccze
https://bugs.debian.org/792949

- Package: cgilib
https://bugs.debian.org/793002

- Package: cgoban
https://bugs.debian.org/792993

- Package: checkpw
https://bugs.debian.org/793005

- Package: chiark-utils
https://bugs.debian.org/792998

- Package: chimera2
https://bugs.debian.org/792949

- Package: console-cyrillic
https://bugs.debian.org/792999

- Package: cvs-mailcommit
https://bugs.debian.org/792947

- Package: daemontools
https://bugs.debian.org/793003

- Package: dbview
https://bugs.debian.org/792951

- Package: debdelta
https://bugs.debian.org/793004

- Package: dhcpdump
https://bugs.debian.org/792951

- Package: dhcping
https://bugs.debian.org/792953

- Package: dpatch
https://bugs.debian.org/792954

- Package: dput
https://bugs.debian.org/792955

- Package: dropbear
https://bugs.debian.org/793006

- Package: dtaus
https://bugs.debian.org/792958

- Package: elida
https://bugs.debian.org/792959

- Package: enemies-of-carlotta
https://bugs.debian.org/792961

- Package: erc
https://bugs.debian.org/792963

- Package: fast-foward
https://bugs.debian.org/792965

- Package: fgetty
https://bugs.debian.org/792967

- Package: flowscan
https://bugs.debian.org/792969

- Package: fortunes-bg
https://bugs.debian.org/792970

- Package: freecdb
https://bugs.debian.org/792989

- Package: ftpcopy
https://bugs.debian.org/792982

- Package: gerstensaft
https://bugs.debian.org/792983

- Package: gpsmanshp
https://bugs.debian.org/792991

- Package: integrit
https://bugs.debian.org/792984

- Package: ipsvd
https://bugs.debian.org/792985

- Package: jargon
https://bugs.debian.org/792987

- Package: junior-doc
https://bugs.debian.org/792971

- Package: libjama
https://bugs.debian.org/792972

- Package: liblip
https://bugs.debian.org/792973

- Package: liblockfile
https://bugs.debian.org/792974

- Package: libmsv
https://bugs.debian.org/792975

- Package: logapp
https://bugs.debian.org/792976

- Package: luakit
https://bugs.debian.org/792977

- Package: nec
https://bugs.debian.org/792978

- Package: runit
https://bugs.debian.org/792979

- Package: skalibs
https://bugs.debian.org/792990

- Package: tworld
https://bugs.debian.org/792980

- Package: uruk
https://bugs.debian.org/792986

- Package: wmweather
https://bugs.debian.org/792981

- Package: xbs
https://bugs.debian.org/792988

Kind Regards,
akira

[1]
https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/not_using_dh_builddeb_issue.html

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds