On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:44:59PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Well, I still would like to push to add `-Wdate-time` to our default set > of CFLAGS. Even with Dhole's patch, developpers would see the warning > and ask themselves if it's the right thing to do.
Good that.
We are now down to 2 packages which FTBFS with -Wdate-time
https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/expeyes.html
https://bugs.debian.org/790103
https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wsjt.html
no bug filed
https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/ftbfs_wdatetime_issue.html
And other 2 packages (subversion and unbound) which fails due to swig
https://bugs.debian.org/790102
https://reproducible.debian.net/issues/unstable/ftbfs_wdatetime_due_to_swig_issue.html
This is what should be done to achive our goal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#Q:_Can_we_add_support_for_new_default_build_flags_to_dpkg-buildflags.3F
To me it seems only the d-d thread is missing, maybe after filing the
missing bug against src:wsjt.
If nobody object I can start that thread.
dpkg bug with the first "timeless" feature:
https://bugs.debian.org/762683
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
