Re: [Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
On 2016-02-04, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'd like to add proper licencing to the presentations in > git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git and you in the to: headers > of the mail are a git commiter to this repository, so I would like you to > (re-)licence your contributions under the following licence: ... > but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under > Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the > user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or > later, > with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts? I think my only contribution was those awful pictures of the armhf build infrastructure, but I'm perfectly fine with those being licensed under anything DFSG-free, and the above proposal sounds fine to me. live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under > Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the > user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or > later, > with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts? Yes, I'm fine with that. Regards, Reiner signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under > Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the I'm going to assume you mean the unported "variant" here. > user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or > later, > with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts? > > If so: please reply to this mail. I'm ok with this. (even if I'm not sure why we would want to double license them with the GFDL..) > Unless I hear compelling not to, I will go with the full list of contributors > as copyright owners and I also only plan to stick this licence on the FOSDEM > 16 talk and future ones. btw, to the question "can slides have a different license than videos", I'm tempted to see the recordings as a derivative work of the slides when they also frame them (the projection), so I'd say that the videos needs to be in compliant (which doesn't necessary mean it's the same) license as the slides, not the other way around. Anyway, I'm just playing evil's advocate, I'm fine with anything that's DFSG-ok for whatever contribution I did, just heed to be compatible to what we used inside (images?) and to what already derivated from them (videos?). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
Hi, On 16-02-04 11:07:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under > Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the > user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or > later, > with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts? I'm totally fine with that :) Cheers, -- Dhole signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
Hi, On 04/02/16 at 11:07 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under > Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the > user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or > later, > with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts? I am fine with the above. Lucas signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
Hi, I forgot to say… On Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016, Holger Levsen wrote: > but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under > Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of > the user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 > or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no > Back-Cover Texts? > > If so: please reply to this mail. yes, rather obviously, I'm fine with his! and I also forget to say: thanks to Ludovic Courtès who's licence textblock I took from his FOSDEM talk available at git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix/maintenance.git :) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] licencing reproducible/presentations.git
Hi,
I'd like to add proper licencing to the presentations in
git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git and you in the to: headers
of the mail are a git commiter to this repository, so I would like you to
(re-)licence your contributions under the following licence:
(in TeX format to ease later integration…)
\begin{textblock}{12}(2, 8)
\tiny{
Copyright \copyright{} 2014--2016 \\
Chris Lamb \texttt{la...@debian.org} \\
Eduard Sanou \texttt{dh...@openmailbox.org} \\
Holger Levsen \texttt{hol...@layer-acht.org} \\
Jérémy Bobbio \texttt{lu...@debian.org} \\
Lucas Nussbaum \texttt{lu...@debian.org} \\
Mattia Rizzolo \texttt{mat...@mapreri.org} \\
Reiner Herrmann \texttt{rei...@reiner-h.de} \\
Valentin Lorentz \texttt{prog...@progval.net} \\
Copyright of images included in this document are held by
their respective owners.
\\[3.0mm]
This work is licensed under the \alert{Creative Commons
Attribution-Share Alike 3.0} License. To view a copy of this
license, visit
\url{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/} or send a
letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San
Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
\\[2.0mm]
At your option, you may instead copy, distribute and/or modify
this document under the terms of the \alert{GNU Free Documentation
License, Version 1.3 or any later version} published by the Free
Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover
Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is
available at \url{http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gfdl.html}.
\\[2.0mm]
% Give a link to the 'Transparent Copy', as per Section 3 of the GFDL.
The source of this document is available from
\url{https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git}.
}
\end{textblock}
I haven't really made up my mind whether it would be better to use this or to
only list Lunar, Chris and myself as the copyright owners, given
$ for AUT in $(git log |grep Author |cut -d "<" -f2 | sort -u) ; do echo -n
"$AUT " ; git log | grep Author: | grep -c $AUT; done
dh...@openmailbox.org> 9
hol...@layer-acht.org> 293
la...@debian.org> 120
lu...@debian.org> 10
lu...@debian.org> 117
mat...@mapreri.org> 3
prog...@progval.net> 3
rei...@reiner-h.de> 6
but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the
user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or later,
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts?
If so: please reply to this mail.
Unless I hear compelling not to, I will go with the full list of contributors
as copyright owners and I also only plan to stick this licence on the FOSDEM
16 talk and future ones.
Thanks!
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
