Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-12 Thread Chris Lamb
Holger Levsen wrote: > i'm confused: uploaded what to where? […] > the commit has a little too little information why this is useful Updated commit to cover both concerns: commit a48e8e4685c204bea66d440014687ef662fdfcc5 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Mon Feb 13 10:00:18 2017 +1300 re

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:43:22AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:27:02PM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Technically true, but I've only uploaded a python2.7 with my > > PYTHONREVERSEDICTKEYORDER patch for amd64 so far. > I didn't notice the upload, as it was not announced

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-12 Thread Chris Lamb
Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I didn't notice the upload, as it was not announced because you didn't > upload the sources; please also upload the source packages Rebuilding and uploading now. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:27:02PM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Technically true, but I've only uploaded a python2.7 with my > PYTHONREVERSEDICTKEYORDER patch for amd64 so far. I didn't notice the upload, as it was not announced because you didn't upload the sources; please also upload the source pa

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-12 Thread Chris Lamb
Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > Umh, could you please set that variable in the pbuilderrc of the second > > > build instead of using the hooks (which I don't understand how that > > > would ever work > > > > I just grepped for existing changes (eg. "I capture the environment"). If > > these things do

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 01:18:56PM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Umh, could you please set that variable in the pbuilderrc of the second > > build instead of using the hooks (which I don't understand how that > > would ever work > > I just grepped for existing changes (eg. "I capture the environmen

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-11 Thread Chris Lamb
> Umh, could you please set that variable in the pbuilderrc of the second > build instead of using the hooks (which I don't understand how that > would ever work I just grepped for existing changes (eg. "I capture the environment"). If these things don't work as you claim, please could you remove

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:46:42AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:08:54AM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (Attachment was too large for Alioth apparently, so re-sending) > > Yes (I discarded the email from the moderation queue now). BTW, yes, remote to pull fr

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

2017-02-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:08:54AM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi, > > (Attachment was too large for Alioth apparently, so re-sending) Yes (I discarded the email from the moderation queue now). > commit 02d4d20ae8eab1440b0d9fba8eda3df860d259d8 > Author: Chris Lamb > Date: Sun Feb 12 10:0