Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-08-25 Thread Paul Kocialkowski
Le mardi 25 août 2015 à 12:20 +0200, Andreas Bießmann a écrit : > On 08/25/2015 11:55 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On 2015-08-25, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > >> On 07/28/2015 05:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > In order to achi

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-08-25 Thread Andreas Bießmann
On 08/25/2015 11:55 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2015-08-25, Andreas Bießmann wrote: >> On 07/28/2015 05:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are defined

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-08-25 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > This commit breaks the following commit: > > commit f3f431a712729a1af94d01bd1bfde17a252ff02c > Author: Chris Packham > Date: Sun May 10 21:02:09 2015 +1200 > > Makefile: Add U_BOOT_TZ and include in version > > Define U_BOOT_TZ alongs

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-08-25 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2015-08-25, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > On 07/28/2015 05:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: >>> In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are >>> defined >>> at build-time have to be somewhat eliminated. The SOURCE

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-08-25 Thread Andreas Bießmann
On 07/28/2015 05:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > >> In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are >> defined >> at build-time have to be somewhat eliminated. The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH >> environment >> variable al

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-07-31 Thread Ximin Luo
On 31/07/15 07:25, Chris Packham wrote: > The problem is that date -u implies UTC. So + is right if you do > want the time to be displayed in UTC (for me living at +12/+13 UTC > makes my head hurt because all the dates are yesterday). > One of the main problems with human-readable date/time i

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-07-30 Thread Chris Packham
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: >> >>> In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are >>> defined >>> at build-time have to b

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] Reproducible U-Boot build support, using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2015-07-30 Thread Bin Meng
Hi, On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > >> In order to achieve reproducible builds in U-Boot, timestamps that are >> defined >> at build-time have to be somewhat eliminated. The SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH >> environment