Hi,
sorry for coming back to this old thread now… end of the year cleaning of old
threads :)
On Mittwoch, 23. September 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> My take on this: I want to wait until we can rebuild packages taken from
> directly the archive. We can easily run these later rebuilds with
>
Chris Lamb:
> I just ran into yet another package where the contents can vary
> depending on whether the tests are run or not.
>
> As an example, without tests a given Python package entirely vanilla and
> is thus reproducible in our toolchain. However, executing the tests
> creates various
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:14:10AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> adding Antonio to the loop, keeping full quote for his benefit.
>
> On Samstag, 19. September 2015, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I just ran into yet another package where the contents can vary
> > depending on whether the tests
Hi,
adding Antonio to the loop, keeping full quote for his benefit.
On Samstag, 19. September 2015, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I just ran into yet another package where the contents can vary
> depending on whether the tests are run or not.
I do think this is an interesting thing to test, but I'm not
