Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#832096: lintian: please check for common typos in debian/rules target names

2016-07-29 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Jakub, Thanks for the review. > Shouldn't it be "possible"? After all, our list of dh_* commands might > be out of date. Indeed it should; I copy-pasted from elsewhere without checking. Fixed. > This doesn't work that well if the typoed command is in close distance > to multiple existing

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#832096: lintian: please check for common typos in debian/rules target names

2016-07-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hi Chris! Thanks for the updated patch. * Chris Lamb , 2016-07-23, 20:13: +Certainty: certain Shouldn't it be "possible"? After all, our list of dh_* commands might be out of date. +# Unknown command, so check for likely misspellings +

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#832096: lintian: please check for common typos in debian/rules target names

2016-07-22 Thread Chris Lamb
Jakub Wilk wrote: > Lintian is already aware of existing dh_* commands (see > data/debhelper/dh_commands), so maybe we could use this list instead of > manually maintaining possible misspellings? Not without changing this data structure as we want multiple misspellings to map to the correct