Re: [Reproducible-builds] Deprecating plain dpkg-buildpackage

2016-08-30 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 07:29:13AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > It could be argued that "We are mainly interested in the
> > reproducibility issue, the FTBFS bugs are just a side effect".
> 
> Indeed.
> I'm fully open to such tests, but imho they would need to be on a
> different project.
> Besides, atm we don't really have spare resources around…

That.


-- 
cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Deprecating plain dpkg-buildpackage

2016-08-27 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi,

Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > And to that I would say "Fine, but what's the point in making a
> > package reproducible when it does not even build from source to begin
> > with?"
> 
> That's an overstatement: packages most usually build just fine ^^
> If the they fail to build is a altoghether differnt problem than just
> reproducible build indeed, and we're not so much concerned (as they
> don't block our general work really).

Nevertheless I've seen no archive-wide rebuild for QA purposes since
the reproducible builds projects runs at full speed.

So IMHO the reproducible builds projects has taken over the task of
reporting FTBFS noticed by rebuilding packages -- independent of being
planned to do so or not.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds


Re: [Reproducible-builds] Deprecating plain dpkg-buildpackage

2016-08-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:59:17PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> If the reproducible builds autobuilders continue to build with
> (the equivalent of) "dpkg-buildpackage", the following FTBFS will be
> missed:

They use `dpkg-buildpackage -b`

> The ideal thing would be to have separate queues for "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> and "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and just forget about "dpkg-buildpackage".

Last time I checked `dpkg-buildpackage -b` was mandatory to be supported
the very same way of -B (and -A is RC only since very few weeks).

> This is really the "standard", what the official autobuilders do,
> and what they will probably continue to do when everybody makes
> source-only uploads, or maybe when the ftp-master queue start
> ignoring the .debs and just pass the source to all the autobuilders.

Be aware that ubuntu's autobuilders use -b for the architecture where
they build the arch:all (currently amd64, was i386), for example, as
they implemented arch:all autobuilders long ago when -A was not
supported.
I agree that this is Debian and we're testing Debian, but really -b is
not going anywhere :)

> It could be argued that "We are mainly interested in the
> reproducibility issue, the FTBFS bugs are just a side effect".

Indeed.
I'm fully open to such tests, but imho they would need to be on a
different project.
Besides, atm we don't really have spare resources around…

> And to that I would say "Fine, but what's the point in making a
> package reproducible when it does not even build from source to begin
> with?"

That's an overstatement: packages most usually build just fine ^^
If the they fail to build is a altoghether differnt problem than just
reproducible build indeed, and we're not so much concerned (as they
don't block our general work really).

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds