Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs, take two

2016-07-22 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:50:13 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote:

> indeed possibly some temporary glitch, it's now marked as reproducible.
> (holger rescheduled it)
> 
> Thanks for notifying us :)

Thanks to you all for your kind replies and for rescheduling the
reproducibility test!:-)

Bye.

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgpCy2TtdBBSA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs, take two

2016-07-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:41:33PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Thursday, July 21 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> 
> > Now, after the latest upload to unstable, I noticed that apt-listbugs
> > was not considered reproducible on armhf [2]. The log states:
> >
> >   E: the second build failed, even though the first build was successful.
> >
> > I am not sure I understand who's to blame: is there anything in
> > apt-listbugs that should be fixed?
> >
> > Could you please tell me what I should do?
> > Should I just wait for the next attempt on armhf? Or is there anything
> > wrong to be fixed?
> 
> It seems like the issue I've had with python-kitchen.  It's not clear
> why this happens, but a simple reschedule was enough to fix the false
> positive for me.

indeed possibly some temporary glitch, it's now marked as reproducible.
(holger rescheduled it)

Thanks for notifying us :)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs, take two

2016-07-21 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Thursday, July 21 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:

> Now, after the latest upload to unstable, I noticed that apt-listbugs
> was not considered reproducible on armhf [2]. The log states:
>
>   E: the second build failed, even though the first build was successful.
>
> I am not sure I understand who's to blame: is there anything in
> apt-listbugs that should be fixed?
>
> Could you please tell me what I should do?
> Should I just wait for the next attempt on armhf? Or is there anything
> wrong to be fixed?

It seems like the issue I've had with python-kitchen.  It's not clear
why this happens, but a simple reschedule was enough to fix the false
positive for me.

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds