Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used
Hi, On Samstag, 18. Juli 2015, Chris Lamb wrote: Fixed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792491 shouldn't we upload dpkg with that fix to our repo then? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used
shouldn't we upload dpkg with that fix to our repo then? If the impact was more widespread, then definitely.. but am tempted to wait until some response from dpkg maintainers, especially as I'm not 100% confident in the patch. -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used
btw: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pyopencl.html After fixing the other issues, I now have a reproducability rate of 50% ... IIRC you are repeating a failed test once to ignore some spurious failures? So you would end up at an error rate of 25% - or less if you were retrying even more. Fixed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792491 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used
On 2015-07-09 18:38, Holger Levsen wrote: PPS: Similarly complex symbols files are used by ocl-icd-libopencl1 and nvidia-libopencl1, too. are these both only in non-free too? ocl-icd is in main and reproducible when tested in our setup: https://reproducible.debian.net/ocl-icd no, you need to test something that uses both OpenCL 1.1 and OpenCL 1.2 functions, e.g. amd-clinfo, erlang-cl, python{,3}-pyopencl{,-dbg}. That list is complete - all rdepends of the libopencl-1.2-1 virtual package. The issue is nondeterministic - a first rebuild after partly fixing another reproducibility issue has not shown this again. Andreas ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 08:23:12PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: The issue is nondeterministic - a first rebuild after partly fixing another reproducibility issue has not shown this again. btw: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pyopencl.html I recall some other cases, where it turned out that the problem is not dpkg's and neither dh's. from dpkg-gencontrol(1): The order of dependencies is preserved as best as possible: if any dependency must be discarded due to another dependency appearing further in the field, the superseding dependency will take the place of the discarded one. That means that whatever passes them to dpkg, has to sort them. I quickly looked to dh_shlibdeps, and (if i got that right) it just call dpkg-shlibdeps. Now I don't have a clue of the order used by this one, and the manpage is way too long to be read in 5 minutes, but I'm fairly sure we didn't patch that file (at least, the changelog does not state so). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dh_shlibdeps dependency ordering not stable if alternate dependency templates are used
Hi, On Donnerstag, 9. Juli 2015, Andreas Beckmann wrote: no, you need to test something that uses both OpenCL 1.1 and OpenCL 1.2 functions, e.g. amd-clinfo, erlang-cl, python{,3}-pyopencl{,-dbg}. That list is complete - all rdepends of the libopencl-1.2-1 virtual package. any of these in main? The issue is nondeterministic - a first rebuild after partly fixing another reproducibility issue has not shown this again. btw: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pyopencl.html cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds