Re: distributing .buildinfo files (Re: Bad interaction between pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master)

2018-04-05 Thread Philipp Kern
On 9/3/17 11:40 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2017-09-02 23:48, Holger Levsen wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:23:29PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >>> > Not yet.  We people from the reproducible team couldn't find a way to >>> > usefully talk to ftp-masters people, whom never replied to any of

Re: distributing .buildinfo files (Re: Bad interaction between pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master)

2017-09-03 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:40:53AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Git is an interesting thought for incremental mirroring. But then it also > seems to be a poor choice for something that is an only growing repository > of data. the nice thing with git is that you get a signed tree for free (or

Re: distributing .buildinfo files (Re: Bad interaction between pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master)

2017-09-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 21:48 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > So I suppose we talk about 13 GB[1] of static content in about 1.7M > > files. Is that something that could be distributed through > > static.debian.org if there are concerns around inodes for the main > > mirrors? Given that they would