Alan Coopersmith wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > > Having engineers rather than gatekeepers marking bugs as > "integrated,"> as Alan describes for non-ON gates, seems broken to > me. > > Well, it is admittedly for gates with no gatekeepers. When you have > a fraction of the developers ON does, you get by with a fraction of > theoverhead too. >
I manage a consolidation with a total of 2 developers. Even with this size the "gatekeeper" role is intact. I would suggest the wording be explicitly stated for the "gatekeeper". Then describe the role the "gatekeeper" conducts as part of the product release process. Although not staffed with a specific "gatekeeper", the consolidation I work on leaves the "integrated" status change to the one conducting the "gatekeeper" role at product release time. Joel. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Joel.Buckley.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 348 bytes Desc: Card for Joel Buckley <Joel.Buckley at Sun.COM> URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20060307/74ff00b8/attachment.vcf>
