I'm working on this. But I'm not moving them to "accounted for" because they aren't. I need a new category for situations like this - where our lack of response has timed someone out. I'm discussing this with a couple of people and will publish what I come up with on this list later this week.
Until then, these need to stay where they are. Thanks. Bonnie Karyn Ritter wrote On 10/23/05 23:55,: > So we should take all of these off the "awaiting sponsor" list? > > Thanks, > > Karyn > > Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > >>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0700, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: >> >> >> >>>>[PATCH] for bug 6249645 spec2trace passes Meta_info structure by value >>>> >>>>http://icculus.org/~eviltypeguy/6249645.patch >>>> >>>>contributor agreement # OS0004 >>> >>>I'll pick this up. Shawn, I'll be in touch with you offline. >> >> >>Due to a lack of time, Shawn has rescinded this request as well as all >>his others. In this particular case, the consensus is that the bug is >>not worth fixing anyway because spec2trace itself should be removed. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > request-sponsor mailing list > request-sponsor at opensolaris.org
