[request-sponsor] CR 6520664: tamarack/hald: cannot mount fat partition inside extended fdisk

2007-02-02 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
J?rgen Keil wrote: > This is a sponsor request for the fix for bug #6520664 > tamarack / hald: cannot mount fat partition inside extended fdisk > > My suggested fix is included in the bug report. > Contributor agreement # : OS0003 I will sponsor this one. -Artem.

[request-sponsor] CR 6526585: hald crashes with SIGSEGV, doesn't mount usb 2.0 flash memory..

2007-02-20 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
J?rgen, This regression was introduced, as you note in the bug report, by the printer events putback. Norm Jacobs is fixing it as part of: 6525048 HAL doesn't completely detect MFP devices I reviewed his code last week, the putback should happen shortly. -Artem.

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] 1 new request-sponsor putback: 39 total

2006-03-02 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
> It would be cool if the diffs would be part of the announcements. The diffs are always attached to the bug ID in the bug database. They don't appear on the bugs.opensolarig.org though. I don't see why they shouldn't for contributed patches, perhaps it's just a technical problem with database

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] 1 new request-sponsor putback: 39 total

2006-03-02 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
> How would it determine which bugs those fields can be exported for? > We can't do it for all bugs, since some contain source which cannot > be disclosed publically. It's not an unsolvable problem. E.g. there could be a special field accessible only from Sun, that the sponsor would set. -Artem