[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-17 Thread Dan Price
On Wed 08 Mar 2006 at 11:42AM, Dan Price wrote: On Wed 08 Mar 2006 at 10:49AM, Karyn Ritter wrote: I'll figure out where to put the definitions. This the real status that is in Bugster, so we need to document it anyway So, I wonder if we could use Perl's WWW::Mechanize [1] or something

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-17 Thread Mike Gerdts
On 3/8/06, Karyn Ritter Karyn.Ritter at sun.com wrote: snip Would something like the table I've just created at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/oss_bite_size/ help? I need to Very nice view of what is out there. Please provide comments ideas about this and other ways we can help

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Danek Duvall
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require people to update the fixed in bugster. People have suggested that we

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:06:46PM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Dave Miner
Danek Duvall wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require people to update the fixed in bugster. People

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-07 Thread Joel Buckley
Alan Coopersmith wrote: James Carlson wrote: Having engineers rather than gatekeepers marking bugs as integrated, as Alan describes for non-ON gates, seems broken to me. Well, it is admittedly for gates with no gatekeepers. When you have a fraction of the developers ON does, you get

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-07 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Joel Buckley wrote: I manage a consolidation with a total of 2 developers. Even with this size the gatekeeper role is intact. I would suggest the wording be explicitly stated for the gatekeeper. Then describe the role the gatekeeper conducts as part of the product release process. Perhaps

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-06 Thread Bill Rushmore
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Jim Grisanzio wrote: * For those who are thinking about contributing code, what can we do to help you get started? Would more oss-bite-size bugs help? More oss-bite-size would be nice. I also have a couple of suggestions for the bug list. One is to make sure the bug

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-06 Thread Keith M Wesolowski
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming from consolidations where the engineer marks the bug fix available when they submit the fix for code review and integrated when they putback to the master

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-06 Thread John Beck
Sanjay ... we don't require people to update the fixed in bugster. The Sanjay fixed, committed and integrated fields get updated only when the build Sanjay closes. Alan That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming Alan from consolidations where the engineer marks the