[request-sponsor] Requesting sponsorship for (smf) bugs: 6383235, 6182530, 6196126, and 6317908

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Martin
On 10/16/07, Liane Praza wrote: > > Mark Martin wrote: > > > > 6383235: smf_maintain_instance() shouldn't fail with SCF_ERROR_DELETED > > 6182530: svcadm alias "enable -t" as start and "disable -t" as stop > > 6196126: svcs -xq > > 6317908: svcs left out the time > > > > I was tempted to tackle: >

[request-sponsor] Requesting sponsorship for (smf) bugs: 6383235, 6182530, 6196126, and 6317908

2007-10-16 Thread Liane Praza
Mark Martin wrote: > Since SMF seems to be my adoptive home, I'd like to try to close out a > few more bugs. > > 6383235: smf_maintain_instance() shouldn't fail with SCF_ERROR_DELETED > 6182530: svcadm alias "enable -t" as start and "disable -t" as stop > 6196126: svcs -xq > 6317908: svcs left ou

[request-sponsor] Requesting sponsorship for (smf) bugs: 6383235, 6182530, 6196126, and 6317908

2007-10-15 Thread Mark Martin
Since SMF seems to be my adoptive home, I'd like to try to close out a few more bugs. 6383235: smf_maintain_instance() shouldn't fail with SCF_ERROR_DELETED 6182530: svcadm alias "enable -t" as start and "disable -t" as stop 6196126: svcs -xq 6317908: svcs left out the time I was tempted to tackl