Re: [Resin-interest] Why must we define beans in xml?

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Thanks... you're absolutely right. Works great. Jeff On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Scott Ferguson f...@caucho.com wrote: On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: Is there a compelling reason why we must define our beans and services in resin-web.xml?  Will this continue to be

Re: [Resin-interest] Why must we define beans in xml?

2009-03-26 Thread Scott Ferguson
On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: Is there a compelling reason why we must define our beans and services in resin-web.xml? Will this continue to be the case going forward in Resin 4.0? You don't need to define the beans in resin-web.xml. You do need a marker file like

[Resin-interest] Why must we define beans in xml?

2009-03-25 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Is there a compelling reason why we must define our beans and services in resin-web.xml? Will this continue to be the case going forward in Resin 4.0? It's a minor nuisance, yes, but... it's nice to add a class to the project, annotate it with @Service or @Stateless or whatever, and have it