[Resteasy-users] Slow PUT request payload processing in client framework

2013-05-23 Thread Ruusu Reino
Hi,

I'm a new person on this list, and I have encountered an issue with the 
RESTEasy Client Framework.

While trying to transfer a 7.5 MB file over a simple PUT request using the 
client framework, the client freezes for minutes while very slowly building a 
temporary file, with 100% CPU utilization. RESTEasy version is 2.3.5_final.

The behaviour is reproduced on a code as simple the one below. The temporary 
file is built before even looking up the address of the server. I don't quite 
understand why a temporary file is necessary in the first place.

Can others reproduce this problem or is it unique to my circumstances?

Code:
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.InputStream;

import javax.ws.rs.Consumes;
import javax.ws.rs.PUT;
import javax.ws.rs.Path;

import org.jboss.resteasy.client.ProxyFactory;
import org.junit.Test;

public class DummyTest {
  @Path(/dummy)
  interface DummyService {
@PUT
@Consumes(*/*)
String process( InputStream data );
  }

  @Test
  public void test() throws FileNotFoundException {
DummyService service = ProxyFactory.create( DummyService.class, 
http://nonexistent.domain/rest/; );

service.process( new FileInputStream( path to a large file ) );
  }
}


--
Reino Ruusu
Research Scientist
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland / Systems Engineering
--
Try New Relic Now  We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app,  servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may___
Resteasy-users mailing list
Resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-users


Re: [Resteasy-users] Slow PUT request payload processing in client framework

2013-05-23 Thread Bill Burke
Apologies, this DefferredOutputSTream stuff was a pull request I didn't 
review thoroughly enough.  I generally buffer these types of things.

The reason why this case exists is because an incompatibility with 
JAX-RS and Apache Http Client.  Apache HC does not let you modify 
headers within HttpEntity calls.  JAX-RS MessageBodyWriters require 
header modification.  So, I have to buffer the marshalling to memory or 
disk.

We can probably put in a special case for FileInputStream as you note.

On 5/23/2013 1:15 PM, Gendler, Samuel wrote:
 There are also many utility classes available for copying between input
 and output streams or readers and writers which will utilize
 best-practices for maximizing throughput.  Those should be used rather
 than a single byte copy in a tight loop, which is NEVER efficient unless
 the data is only arriving a byte at a time, and that case is handled by
 the fact that any read into a buffer will read UP TO buffer size bytes.
 See ByteStreams.copy() from google’s Guava or IOUtils in commons-io for
 well regarded utility classes.

 *From:*Ruusu Reino [mailto:reino.ru...@vtt.fi]
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:21 AM
 *To:* resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 *Subject:* Re: [Resteasy-users] Slow PUT request payload processing in
 client framework

 Hello,

 I’ve now looked into this a bit deeper. The culprit is a loop that
 copies data a single byte at a time from the InputStream into a
 DeferredFileOutputStream. This loop is in the method
 InputStreamProvider.writeTo().

 If the message body is delivered as a File instead of an InputStream,
 the process is much faster, as the data transfer occurs in packages of
 2048 bytes in a loop at ProviderHelper.writeTo(), called by
 FileProvider.writeTo().

 Still, as the data is copied verbatim from the source into a temporary
 file, even when the input is itself a File object, the whole operation
 seems to be quite a bit of waste of valuable resources.

 Is there a way to entirely avoid the creation of this quite unnecessary
 temporary file?

 Alternatively, there seems to be a property for controlling the
 threshold for the creation of this temporary file, which defaults to
 only 1 MB, in the ApacheHttpClient4Executor class. What is the simplest
 way to tweak this parameter from client code?

 -- *
 *Reino Ruusu
 Research Scientist
 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland / Systems Engineering

 *From:*Ruusu Reino [mailto:reino.ru...@vtt.fi]
 *Sent:* 23. toukokuuta 2013 15:49
 *To:* resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 mailto:resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 *Subject:* [Resteasy-users] Slow PUT request payload processing in
 client framework

 Hi,

 I’m a new person on this list, and I have encountered an issue with the
 RESTEasy Client Framework.

 While trying to transfer a 7.5 MB file over a simple PUT request using
 the client framework, the client freezes for minutes while very slowly
 building a temporary file, with 100% CPU utilization. RESTEasy version
 is 2.3.5_final.

 The behaviour is reproduced on a code as simple the one below. The
 temporary file is built before even looking up the address of the
 server. I don’t quite understand why a temporary file is necessary in
 the first place.

 Can others reproduce this problem or is it unique to my circumstances?

 Code:

 *import*java.io.FileInputStream;

 *import*java.io.FileNotFoundException;

 *import*java.io.InputStream;

 *import*javax.ws.rs.Consumes;

 *import*javax.ws.rs.PUT;

 *import*javax.ws.rs.Path;

 *import*org.jboss.resteasy.client.ProxyFactory;

 *import*org.junit.Test;

 *public**class*DummyTest {

 @Path(/dummy)

 *interface*DummyService {

 @PUT

 @Consumes(*/*)

  String process( InputStream data );

}

 @Test

 *public**void*test() *throws*FileNotFoundException {

  DummyService service = ProxyFactory./create/(
 DummyService.*class*, http://nonexistent.domain/rest/;);

  service.process( *new*FileInputStream( path to a large
 file) );

}

 }

 -- *
 *Reino Ruusu
 Research Scientist
 VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland / Systems Engineering

 **
 E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Western Asset therefore
 recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive
 information to us via electronic mail, including social security
 numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery,
 and or timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Western Asset
 therefore recommends that you do not send time sensitive or
 action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
 **


 --
 Try New Relic Now  We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
 New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
 that delivers powerful full stack analytics.