Re: [Resteasy-users] Resteasy authentication

2011-07-07 Thread foster
Hi Bill, Could you elaborate a bit more here? We do have plan to use OAuth, so I'm curious what are the areas we need to pay more attention specifically and add additional work by ourselves. Also, what's your plan for full OAuth support? Thanks a lot! foster ---

Re: [Resteasy-users] Resteasy authentication

2011-07-07 Thread Bill Burke
I'm very disappointed in OAuth 2.0. 1. It doesn't describe what the token is supposed to look like 2. It doesn't describe the authentication protocol between client and provider. So, what is the point of supporting it when half of the protocol is application/IDP dependent? If you have requirem

Re: [Resteasy-users] Resteasy-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 1

2011-07-07 Thread kwground kwground
Thanks Bill. Actually, we are still looking forward to implement OAuth 1.0a (mainly 2-legged), so if you can pinpoint any areas (within current Resteasy oauth support) we need to finish up or brush up in order to be prod ready, it would be great. appreciated! foster > Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14