Re: No compare

2000-05-23 Thread Matthew Tevenan
Compare errors which mention data or resource offsets usually indicate device communication problems. You can refer to the Retrospect User's Guide for general device troubleshooting and maintenance, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for further troubleshooting steps. Some things to check for: 1

No compare

2000-05-22 Thread Radu-Dan Sabau
Suddently Retrospect begins to show a list of File "xyz" didn't compare at data offset integer after backing up some clients. Any suggestions ? -- -- To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Backup and Compare Performance ... lots of small files

2000-05-18 Thread Rob Davies
Title: RE: Backup and Compare Performance ... lots of small files I'm not familiar with this particular backup device but it sounds like the read head is out of alignment with the write head. To eliminate other causes we would 1. clean the heads 2. run a short test backup/ compare/ restore

Re: Backup and Compare Performance ... lots of small files

2000-05-17 Thread John F. Lambert
Anyone had similar experiences where the hierarchy of the data has a dramatic effect on performance? I find that Retrospect on a 10base T network, Backup Server on a Pentium II 233, Client on a PowerBook G3 266, (or even better, on Virtual PC on a PB G3 266) can achieve 60MB/min transfer

Backup and Compare Performance ... lots of small files

2000-05-16 Thread Malcolm McLeary
Guys, I've just installed a new server for a client and all was going well until the client stated using his existing data which we had copied to a group share ... its a slug. This is particularly noticable when doing a backup, copy is bad but it is even worse during the compare phase