Re: retro for a small windows set-up

1999-12-28 Thread Andrew Cook
Hi, For such a small backup, I think DAT might be a bit expensive. Just my $0.02. Also, I think that zip disks would be more reliable, but who knows - luckily(?) retrospect is very good at error checking, so you only need to worry about media failure after backup. For 600MB, why not look at a

RE: retro for a small windows set-up

1999-12-28 Thread Thone, Bradley A (Swbt)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 1999 1:13 PM To: retro-talk Subject: Re: retro for a small windows set-up Hi, For such a small backup, I think DAT might be a bit expensive. Just my $0.02. Also, I think that zip disks would be more reliable, but who knows - luckily(?) retrospect

Re: retro for a small windows set-up

1999-12-28 Thread Matthew Tevenan
To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 16:27:58 -0600 To: "'retro-talk'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: retro for a small windows set-up Are they not the cases that: If Retrospect supports the device, Dantz has a built-in driver for it, and no MFR driv