Re: Review Board Ticket #4486: Requests 2.12.1 breaks diff viewer and review creation

2016-11-17 Thread David Trowbridge
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4486/ -- New update by solarmist For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4486

Re: Review Board Ticket #4486: Requests 2.12.1 breaks diff viewer and review creation

2016-11-17 Thread Joshua Olson
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4486/ -- New update by solarmist For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4486

Re: Review Board Ticket #4486: Requests 2.12.1 breaks diff viewer and review creation

2016-11-17 Thread David Trowbridge
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4486/ -- New update by solarmist For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4486

Re: Review Board Ticket #4486: Requests 2.12.1 breaks diff viewer and review creation

2016-11-17 Thread Joshua Olson
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4486/ -- New update by solarmist For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4486

using --diff-filename doesn't allow you to specify a diff rather than generating a diff from rbtools in mercurial

2016-11-17 Thread John
We are attempting to use rbtools for creating new review requests using distributed source control (mercurial). I know in an ideal world we are required to commit and then generate the review; However, there are few that would like to just create the review request from their current

Review Board Ticket #4486: Requests 2.12.1 breaks diff viewer and review creation

2016-11-17 Thread Joshua Olson
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4486/ -- New ticket #4486 by solarmist For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Re: Initial login to ReviewBoard site says Manual server updates required

2016-11-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Take a look at https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/admin/installation/creating-sites/ (The same instructions work for 2.0, but the docs haven't been backported). On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:46 AM Dunnigan, Terrence J < terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com> wrote: > I found this on the 2.0

RE: Initial login to ReviewBoard site says Manual server updates required

2016-11-17 Thread Dunnigan, Terrence J
I found this on the 2.0 documentation pages (https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/admin/installation/creating-sites/): Ø On Fedora and Red Hat-derived systems, the following commands should be run (as root) to avoid SELinux denials:: $ setsebool -P httpd_can_sendmail 1 $ setsebool -P

Re: Initial login to ReviewBoard site says Manual server updates required

2016-11-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
That old post is far out of date. See the online documentation which describes how to run Review Board with SELinux in enforcing mode (much more secure!) On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:59 AM Muneer wrote: > Hi, > > The issue is resolved. > I came across an old post from Christian,

Re: Initial login to ReviewBoard site says Manual server updates required

2016-11-17 Thread Muneer
Hi, The issue is resolved. I came across an old post from Christian, "Can you check if SELinux is turned on, and if so, turn it off? Christian " and that did the trick. I changed the SeLinux status to 'permissive'. Perhaps this Tip also should be enlisted in the Reviewboard initial page and