Review Board 7 has been released!

Hey everyone, We've just released Review Board 7. This is a major release featuring some long-requested features, including:  Dark Mode and Light Mode themes  Image review in the diff viewer  Mobile diff review  Microsoft Teams support Dark Mode is still in beta. You can opt into it through

Re: dismiss user can login with any password

our LDAP server is not allow anonymous bind, so I config the ReviewBoard LDAP Bind Account and Password. 在2024年5月30日星期四 UTC+8 12:17:54 写道： > We've seen this kind of behavior before with some misconfigurations. Would > you be able to share your LDAP configuration in Review Board, and let us >

Re: dismiss user can login with any password

Authentication configuration as following: Authentication Method: LDAP LDAP Server: ldap://10.0.0.66:3289 ReviewBoard LDAP Bind Account: CN=scmldap,OU=ServiceAccount,DC=spreadtrum,DC=com ReviewBaord LDAP Bind Password: LDAP Base DN: DC=spreadtrum,DC=com Username Attribute:

Re: dismiss user can login with any password

We've seen this kind of behavior before with some misconfigurations. Would you be able to share your LDAP configuration in Review Board, and let us know if your LDAP server is configured to allow anonymous binds? David On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:40 PM 胡一辉 wrote: > Hello: > > In our ReviewBoard

dismiss user can login with any password

Hello: In our ReviewBoard 5.0.1, use Ldap to authenticate user login, If anyone dismiss, IT will disalbe his account in ldap server and we find an issue: login the dismiss user account, with any password, the login will be successfully. but for anyone who not dismiss, only the correct password

Re: Cannot Fix/Drop/Re-open Issue in Safari browser (version 6.0.2)

Hi Christian, I can confirm that the logged in user is also the owner of the review request. If I'm logged in as another user (that is not the owner), then the issue buttons do not show up. This issue only happens in the Safari browser. I am able to successfully update the issue (mark as

Re: Default / configuration value for "Publish and Archive" / "Archive after publishing" option

Hi Wade, Definitely something worth adding. We're finalizing the Review Board 7 release now, but have this tracked for a follow-up. Christian On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:06 PM 'Wade Carpenter' via Review Board Community wrote: > The "Archive after publishing" option when submitting a review is

Re: Older reviews has patch issue after upgraded from Reviewboard version 2.0.18 to 6.0.2

Hi Andy, Unfortunately, without having access to the files and digging around on your server, we can't say what's going on here. We'd need to work more closely with you on gathering information from the server, the contents of files (under NDA), and potentially send some builds your way for

Re: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 7622: ordinal not in range(128)

This is in part due to a bug in a third-party library we're using. Review Board 7 will be out soon, and removes this dependency, moving to a more modern and maintained library that thankfully resolves this. Christian On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:01 AM Paulius wrote: > Hello again. > > For anyone

Re: Gravatar feature doesn't work in version 6.0.2

Hi Andy, We can verify this, and are working on a fix. Christian On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:54 PM Andy Fong wrote: > Hi, > > We just recently upgraded to version 6.0.2, but the "Avatar Service" under > account profile couldn't save if I pick "Gravatar". From Google Chrome > Developer Tools

Re: Cannot Fix/Drop/Re-open Issue in Safari browser (version 6.0.2)

Hi Becky, Can you verify that your logged-in user (shown in the top-right) matches the owner of the review request? Certainly it shouldn't show the buttons if you're not able to use it. There may be a bug here. However, you shouldn't be getting an HTTP 403 in this case. We'll see if we can

Come hang out in the Review Board Discord!

Hey everyone! We've just launched the Review Board Discord server, where you can track Review Board development, engage in Q, help beta test the product, and hang out with other software developers. That last part is a big one for us. We don't want this to be a Review Board fan club, but rather

Cannot Fix/Drop/Re-open Issue in Safari browser (version 6.0.2)

Hi, In Safari, I'm unable to perform actions on the issues by clicking the 'Fixed', 'Drop' and 'Re-open' buttons. When I click the button, the buttons grey out (shown in screenshot below) but never complete. [image: button-grey-out.png] Refreshing the page show no changes to the issue. I get

Default / configuration value for "Publish and Archive" / "Archive after publishing" option

The "Archive after publishing" option when submitting a review is great. Generally, I want to do this by default. Is there a way to configure it? Would it be something to consider adding? [image: image.png] -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Gravatar feature doesn't work in version 6.0.2

Hi, We just recently upgraded to version 6.0.2, but the "Avatar Service" under account profile couldn't save if I pick "Gravatar". From Google Chrome Developer Tools --> Console, I could see the error: "An invalid form control with name='file-upload-avatar_upload' is not focusable. ​" Any

Re: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 7622: ordinal not in range(128)

Hello again. For anyone running into the same issue, I fixed it by changing port from 587 to 25 in email "E-MAIL SERVER SETTINGS" On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 5:38:39 PM UTC+1 Paulius wrote: > Hello! > > I recently installed(5.0.5) and upgraded(6.0.2) Review Board. I am testing > out email

Re: Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

Ah nice, I'll try that thanks! I tried copying same version to same version on new server, which didn't go well. On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 2:51:30 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote: > Since you have to upgrade the world, you may find it easiest to set up a > completely new system with a

Re: Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

Since you have to upgrade the world, you may find it easiest to set up a completely new system with a brand new install of Review Board. Once you've verified that everything is set up correctly, you can replace the database and site directory with the ones from your old server, and run rb-site

Re: Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

Great thank you. I found that adding an upgraded python while doing the ugprade confuses the upgrade and python 3 scripts were failing running referencing python2.7/site-packages. Also upgrading to python3 breaks 2.5.16. So, upgrade python3 and reviewboard will pull 2.5.16 into a working

Re: Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

You definitely need to make sure that everything is using the same Python version. In particular, if you're using something like Apache, you need to make sure that your mod_wsgi is built with the same Python version as everything that is installed. Moving to Python 3 is definitely annoying, but

Re: Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look at logs. I was trying to go to 4, but when seeing issues, tried something more conservative. Bumping 2.5.16 to 6 means I'd have to switch to python 3. When I tried upgrading to 4 I found an issue where it was conflicting between using 2 and 3.

Older reviews has patch issue after upgraded from Reviewboard version 2.0.18 to 6.0.2

Hi, After we migrated our reviewboard instance to a new server and upgraded from version 2.0.18 to 6.0.2, some older reviews has issue with patch with message like the following: == patching file CM.groovy-new (read from CM.groovy) Hunk #3 FAILED at 295. 1 out of 3 hunks

'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 7622: ordinal not in range(128)

Hello! I recently installed(5.0.5) and upgraded(6.0.2) Review Board. I am testing out email service but getting error once review is updated. Error below. - Test email from settings was successfully sent. - I still receive error emails about this but not review emails Any idea what has

Re: Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

The "taking a nap" error means that Review Board is crashing somewhere. Can you check the reviewboard and web server logs for errors? I'd definitely suggest just going straight from your original version to your target version (preferably 6). Doing upgrades to intermediate versions is not

Problem upgrading from 2.5.16

Hello all, I am tryin to upgrade from 2.5.16 on a CentOS 7 machine to anything on RHEL8. Ultimately my only option is to upgrade in place on the CentOS 7 box. I've been trying to do the upgrade on a VM clone and have been so far unsuccessful. I had various issues going straight to 4.0 (where

Re: Cant not use rest api create repository

When sending data to the API, you need to use form-data rather than JSON. So your curl call would look more like: curl ...args. -F name=test -F tool=git On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:56 AM 刘天明 wrote: > ReviewBoard version: 6.0.2 > i wan use rest api create repository > document： >

gitlab and self-signed certificate

Hey! I have Reviewboard running in a docker using docker compose and we have self hosted Gitlab with self-signed certificate. When I try to add repository using "GitLab" as a hosting service I get the following [1] error. If I use None (custom repository) and git then after clicking safe I get

Cant not use rest api create repository

ReviewBoard version: 6.0.2 i wan use rest api create repository document： https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/6.x/webapi/2.0/resources/repository-list/#POST the request use crul: curl --location --request POST 'https://reviewboard.xx.com/api/repositories/' \ --header 'Authorization:

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

This honestly slipped by, as we’ve all been busy trying to make a deadline. We’ll aim to get new images by this weekend. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 01:01 'Florian Miedniak' via Review Board Community wrote: > Any

RE: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

Any news on update of the docker image? From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Christian Hammond Sent: Donnerstag, 7. März 2024 10:48 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above BeSecure! This email comes from outside of

Re: ValidateDiffCommitResource does not have an attribute "validation_info"

I have RBT version: RBTools 4.1 (Python 3.10.12) mandag den 18. marts 2024 kl. 14.26.43 UTC+1 skrev Lasse Bonner: > Hello, I get this error: > CRITICAL: This ValidateDiffCommitResource does not have an attribute > "validation_info". > when trying to run *rbt post*. > > Here is my -d log of the

Re: Customize the review pane to add some general info

Yakir, We do have the ability for extensions to add additional content to various pages. There are a number of defined hook points within the review request box. See https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/latest/extending/extensions/hooks/template-hook/#template-hook for details. David On Thu,

ValidateDiffCommitResource does not have an attribute "validation_info"

Hello, I get this error: CRITICAL: This ValidateDiffCommitResource does not have an attribute "validation_info". when trying to run *rbt post*. Here is my -d log of the same call >>> RBTools 4.1 >>> Python 3.10.12 (main, Nov 20 2023, 15:14:05) [GCC 11.4.0] >>> Running on

Re: You are not licensed to post review requests against AWS CodeCommit repositories.

Thanks, that was the solution :) torsdag den 14. marts 2024 kl. 16.36.42 UTC+1 skrev David Trowbridge: > Lasse, > > You'll need to configure users for Power Pack at > /admin/extensions/rbpowerpack.extension.PowerPackExtension/config/ > > David > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Lasse Bonner

Re: Reviewboard 6.0.2 in Docker connects to the wrong memcached server 50% of the time

Hello, you are right, the setting was wrong, as seen from the screenshot below. Putting proper URL fixes the problem. Sorry for bothering, then. I was handling the whole migration process from the command line and didn't occur to me to check the admin area, I assume what's in the DB overrides

Re: You are not licensed to post review requests against AWS CodeCommit repositories.

Lasse, You'll need to configure users for Power Pack at /admin/extensions/rbpowerpack.extension.PowerPackExtension/config/ David On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Lasse Bonner wrote: > When trying to upload a diff file manually I get this error: > You are not licensed to post review requests

Re: Reviewboard 6.0.2 in Docker connects to the wrong memcached server 50% of the time

Can you check what the cache configuration is at /admin/settings/general/ ? David On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Szymon Niemiec wrote: > Hello everyone, > We are using latest reviewboard and we've recently migrated to Docker > setup. Problem is, reviewboard randomly spits error 500 while

You are not licensed to post review requests against AWS CodeCommit repositories.

When trying to upload a diff file manually I get this error: You are not licensed to post review requests against AWS CodeCommit repositories. I am using an IAM user when full admin privileges. Any ideas? Best regards Lasse Bonner -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Reviewboard 6.0.2 in Docker connects to the wrong memcached server 50% of the time

Hello everyone, We are using latest reviewboard and we've recently migrated to Docker setup. Problem is, reviewboard randomly spits error 500 while browsing the site. Looking into `docker compose logs -f`, we can see that sometimes (not always) it tries to connect to memcached server on

Re: State of rbchecklist extension

Hi David, thanks for that confirmation, I already suspected this. This definitely answers my question, if it's worth to build upon rbchecklist extension. -Florian On Monday, March 11, 2024 at 5:46:00 PM UTC+1 David Trowbridge wrote: > Florian, > > The rbchecklist codebase is quite ancient and

Re: State of rbchecklist extension

Florian, The rbchecklist codebase is quite ancient and really needs a full rewrite. Those discarded changes were from student projects and we decided we didn't particularly want to be landing changes when we knew that the underlying design had some fundamental flaws. I'd love to be able to spend

State of rbchecklist extension

Hi, in our setup we need some kind of checklist both to guide the reviewers and to document that some aspects like security have been part of the review. So, I had a look at rbchecklist extension and managed to build and install it for testing: Creating a checklist from scratch works just

Re: Review Board Ticket #5019: Send mail notificaton is not work with network proxy

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5019/ -- New update by bandv For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #5019 Reply:

Re: LDAP configuration issue - Reviewboard 4.0.4

Hi Tom, quite late answer, but maybe it still helps: I had the very same problem using Reviewboard 6.0.2 and used the workaround as showed by you, also finding it working but ugly. If finally managed to solve it by: 1. cp /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ 2. /usr/sbin/update-ca-certificates

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

It's built from this branch. The problem has to do with when the libldap-common is being installed. That install is happening in stage 1 of the build, but that only applies to compilation and initial setup. The problem is that stage 2 never installs this, so it doesn't end up in the final image.

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

Seems that change in Dockerfile didn't make it into the image: $ docker images --digests | grep beanbag beanbag/reviewboard latest sha256:b74f9efcb53d5ed106fcfedc0d3cdd54128d3c6e6ad9ec565c99e5247813b4d9 61f6fb5c47b3 *5 hours ago*737MB

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

Hmm, that should have been picked up. Let me take another look. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:45 'Florian Miedniak' via Review Board Community < reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, not … :-/ > > > >

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

Unfortunately, not … :-/ It seems the change of the Dockerfile ( https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/5fc77fd85bf11cb5e0d6e6551a5579fa07bd1fba#diff-e818f6b11598d2656922413d3912abb820c175e2f739549dbda55cc9559bd6fddoesn’t ) didn’t make it into the updated docker image:

RE: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

Unfortunately, not … :-/ It seems the change of the Dockerfile (https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/5fc77fd85bf11cb5e0d6e6551a5579fa07bd1fba#diff-e818f6b11598d2656922413d3912abb820c175e2f739549dbda55cc9559bd6fddoesn’t) didn’t make it into the updated docker image:

Re: Link to manual

Hey Erik, Sorry, this had slipped through the cracks in my inbox, but we’re getting this fixed. It’s an issue with some changes made to the docs infrastructure on our website, so it’ll automatically work with all versions of Review Board once we deploy the fix. Christian -- Christian Hammond

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

Thanks for the report and the patch! We’ve deployed new images with this library installed, so hopefully that sorts things out. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 08:25 'Florian Miedniak' via Review Board Community <

Re: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5023/ On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 12:33:57 PM UTC+1 Florian Miedniak wrote: > I just stumbled upon this: libldap-common missing in > beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above. > > This has a nasty consequence: Verification of LDAPS servers with > non-public

Re: Review Board Ticket #5023: Verification of LDAPS servers with non-public certificates not possible anymore with docker image beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5023/ -- New update by fmiedniak-abb For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #5023

Review Board Ticket #5023: Verification of LDAPS servers with non-public certificates not possible anymore with docker image beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5023/ -- New ticket #5023 by fmiedniak-abb For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status:

libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above

I just stumbled upon this: libldap-common missing in beanbag/reviewboard:6.0 and above. This has a nasty consequence: Verification of LDAPS servers with non-public certificates is not possible anymore! Instead, RB will just report the very unspecific error: Error authenticating with LDAP:

Re: RB 6.0.1 upload diff file

After updating to version 6.0.2, the form appears, but I cannot publish it, I get an error: 2024-03-05 09:47:10,420 - ERROR - None - demo - /reviews/r/_batch/ - reviewboard.reviews.views.batch - Failed to publish review request 4879: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 7622:

Re: ReviewBoard SSO with Azure AD

I'm sorry, I didn't saw your reply earlier. I'm gonna try that again later. Thanks Le mardi 27 février 2024 à 01:26:16 UTC+9, David Trowbridge a écrit : > Hi, > > It looks like your server name is set to "https://example.com; in the > Review Board General Settings page. SAML requires the

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Glad it's all working! Please let us know if there's anything else we can help with. David On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:56 AM Florian Miedniak wrote: > Yes, it was migrated from production to a staging environment and there > was some misconfiguration of docker volumes causing ReviewBoard to >

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Yes, it was migrated from production to a staging environment and there was some misconfiguration of docker volumes causing ReviewBoard to re-create the secret. *After fixing the docker volume configuration and filling with the data and configuration file from production it finally works like a

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Was this migrated from another server? If so, can you check that the SECRET_KEY is the same in the reviewboard config file? David On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:56 AM Florian Miedniak wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks for your quick and detailed answer. I now managed to build and > install pysvn with

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Hi David, thanks for your quick and detailed answer. I now managed to build and install pysvn with the help of your installer script. Output seems fine so far (see below), but in the end the situation is very similar as already described: - Type/account column is still reading "subversion

Re: The eviewboard api does not change users emails

It works just with: PUT -F Thanks On Friday, March 1, 2024 at 9:49:18 PM UTC+4 David Trowbridge wrote: > Parameters to PUT and POST operations in the API need to be specified as > form-data, not query parameters or JSON. This can be done with the -F > parameter to curl: > > curl -H

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Florian, If you're seeing "missing support" in the list, it's because pysvn isn't loaded correctly. You'll still be able to create/edit repositories but they won't actually work until that's fixed. Recreating the repository configurations won't change that, and deleting a repository entry will

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Hi David, I'm using the docker images, both for 5.0.5 and 6.0.2. For the 6.0.2 rb container I installed pysvn via Pip. Since adding a new subversion repo worked just fine, I doubt it's a general problem of pysvn, right? Any further ideas? Anything I can do to further track it down? Btw, it would

Re: Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Florian, You probably had subvertpy installed previously. Review Board 6 has removed the subvertpy backend because it caused significant problems. You'll need to install PySVN. We have a guide for doing that at

Re: The eviewboard api does not change users emails

Parameters to PUT and POST operations in the API need to be specified as form-data, not query parameters or JSON. This can be done with the -F parameter to curl: curl -H "Authorization: ..." -H "Accept: ..." -X PUT-F "email=" https:///api/users// David On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:45 AM Lyova

The eviewboard api does not change users emails

Hi, I am using RB 6.0.2 and I want to change multiply users emails, so I need to use the api. I tried many options, but I could not update any user's email. My query is: curl -H "Authorization: token " -H "Accept: application/json" -X PUT "https:///api/users//?email=" The response is as

Error on SCM repo migration from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2

Hi, I'm just trying to upgrade from RB 5.0.5 to 6.0.2, which went quite well so far. Though, having a look at the upgraded installation, I discovered a problem with SCM repository settings: Repos that had been are properly configured for Subversion in RB 5.0.5, are missing the repo-specific

Customize the review pane to add some general info

Hi, Would it be possible to add an extension that modifies the structure of a review pane? See image below. I would like to add a colored label/text which will act as a guideline for reviewers, for example, where the black arrow is pointing. [image: board_review.png] Has someone tried that

Re: ReviewBoard SSO with Azure AD

Hi, It looks like your server name is set to "https://example.com; in the Review Board General Settings page. SAML requires the server name to be set correctly to whatever domain your IdP is expecting. David On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 9:23 AM Enzo wrote: > Hello! > > I was wondering if anyone

ReviewBoard SSO with Azure AD

Hello! I was wondering if anyone had more precise instructions on configuring Sign-on with SAML for a web application with Azure AD (Now Entra ID). I have created an enterprise application and enabled SAML. However, when I try to use "Log in with SAML" on the application, I receive a 502 Bad

Rhodecode

Hi All How does one setup a RhodeCode repository in Reviewboard? I don't think Rhodecode supports the `hgweb` API that Reviewboard seems to be using. Cheers R -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check

Re: Unable to add Trello integration

Found a workaround... The Trello API Token won't work if typed in the Trello configuration page of the Administration -> Integrations menu of your Admin page. Rather go directly to Administration -> Database -> Integration configuration, select your Trello integration and in the Settings

Review Board Ticket #5019: Send mail notificaton is not work with network proxy

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5019/ -- New ticket #5019 by bandv For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Re: Security Releases: Review Board 6.0.2, 5.0.7, 4.0.13, 3.0.26

Hi, My apologies, the Docker images hadn't pushed correctly. They've been pushed since for 4.0.13, 5.0.7, and 6.0.2. Christian On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:08 PM RBUser wrote: > When will the docker images for these new releases be published? > > On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 2:31:17 PM UTC-5

Re: RBTools Ticket #5001: Please add detailed information about reviewboard URL to rbt login

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5001/ -- New update by shubhar For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #5001 Reply:

Re: RBTools Ticket #5001: Please add detailed information about reviewboard URL to rbt login

has any attempts been made to fix this one ? On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 2:21:57 PM UTC-8 Shubha Ramani wrote: > To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5001/ > > New update by shubhar > > For Beanbag, Inc. ▸ RBTools >

Re: Review Board Ticket #5016: perforce rbt post fails with 500 internal error

Just wanted to circle back. I had ZERO problems with version 5.0.6. It works. So I fell back to 5.0.6 FYI On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 6:21:27 AM UTC-8 Shubha Ramani wrote: > happy to provide the info: > atlvptwebapp01:/webapp/PYTHON_VENVS/ReviewBoard-6.0.1-venv/bin[ 66 ] --> > ./pip

Re: Security Releases: Review Board 6.0.2, 5.0.7, 4.0.13, 3.0.26

When will the docker images for these new releases be published? On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 2:31:17 PM UTC-5 Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Today's releases address a security bug discovered in-house with one of > our APIs, and fixes stability issues in Review Board 6. > > See

Re: RBTools Ticket #5001: Please add detailed information about reviewboard URL to rbt login

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5001/ -- New update by shubhar For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #5001 Reply:

Security Releases: Review Board 6.0.2, 5.0.7, 4.0.13, 3.0.26

Hi everyone, Today's releases address a security bug discovered in-house with one of our APIs, and fixes stability issues in Review Board 6. See the release announcement for full

Re: Trying to install latest review board on a new system is failing

Thanks! I will engage the team that does libffi. On Friday, January 12, 2024 at 6:01:59 PM UTC-6 Christian Hammond wrote: > Ah. Well, this is the first time I've heard of anyone attempting to > install Review Board on AIX, so I don't have a definitive answer for you > there. AIX isn't part of

Re: Trying to install latest review board on a new system is failing

Ah. Well, this is the first time I've heard of anyone attempting to install Review Board on AIX, so I don't have a definitive answer for you there. AIX isn't part of our set of tested systems for the installer. As we depend on a series of third-party libraries, we're also limited by their own AIX

Re: Trying to install latest review board on a new system is failing

I am attempting to install this on AIX using the IBM Maintained Open Source. I have the following libffi installed: libffi.ppc 3.4.4-2 @AIX_Toolbox libffi-devel.ppc

Re: Cannot add users to group if avatars are disabled

Thanks for this report (and the others). We’re looking into fixes for these, with an ETA of 6.0.3 (we’re frozen now for 6.0.2). Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 23:58 Mikalai Ananenka wrote: > Hello, > There is an issue

Re: Trying to install latest review board on a new system is failing

Hi, It looks like there's a missing libffi package, which you'll need to install. What Linux distro/version are you on? While it won't help right now, we do have a universal installer coming out soon that takes care of all necessary packages on all supported distros/versions, so that would help

Trying to install latest review board on a new system is failing

Hello, I am trying to do a clean new install of review board. I have resolved a number of issues already but have not been able to resolve. The output from pip is: # pip3 install ReviewBoard --root-user-action=ignore Collecting ReviewBoard Using cached

Review Board Ticket #5018: Hit target for checkboxes in dashboard is annoying

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5018/ -- New ticket #5018 by david For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Re: Review Board Ticket #4992: Can't connect to GitLab repository

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4992/ -- New update by 4517 For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4992 Reply:

Re: GitLab repository create review request failed.

Looking into this, your GitLab version is quite old. We've verified that this works correctly with modern versions. David On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 3:54 PM Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the report. The exception information is very helpful! > > We’ll look into what changed in

Re: Cannot log in from "Logged out" page

Hi, This is a known issue and will be fixed in 6.0.2 David On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:18 AM Mikalai Ananenka wrote: > Hello, > Although this is minor issue, it can affect user experience, so I thought > you might want to fix it. RB 6.0.1. > > Ensure you are logged in and then click "Log out"

Cannot log in from "Logged out" page

Hello, Although this is minor issue, it can affect user experience, so I thought you might want to fix it. RB 6.0.1. Ensure you are logged in and then click "Log out" popup menu item. You will be redirected to "Logged out" page (/account/logout/). Now click "Log in" button. You will be

Cannot delete repositories on repository list page

Hello, Part of the Administration UI functionality does not work. RB 6.0.1. Go to the repositories list (/admin/db/scmtools/repository/), select one or more repositories, and click "Delete selected Repositories". Nothing happens. [image: Screenshot 2024-01-04 at 10-31-59 Select Repository to

Cannot add users to group if avatars are disabled

Hello, There is an issue adding users to groups from the Administration UI. RB 6.0.1. Disable avatars (go to /admin/settings/avatars/ and uncheck "Enable avatars"). Start adding new group (go to /admin/db/reviews/group/add/). Click on "Users" combo box. Nothing happens, while, when avatars are

Re: RB 6.0.1 upload diff file

That will be fixed with the same patch. Thanks. David On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 5:25 AM Mikalai Ananenka wrote: > Note, just in case it has to be fixed separately and has not yet been > fixed, there is a similar issue with "Update Diff" popup window (click on > existing review request which uses

Re: RB 6.0.1 upload diff file

Note, just in case it has to be fixed separately and has not yet been fixed, there is a similar issue with "Update Diff" popup window (click on existing review request which uses Subversion → Update → Update Diff). On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 9:35:39 PM UTC+3 David Trowbridge wrote: > Hi

Re: GitLab repository create review request failed.

Hi, Thanks for the report. The exception information is very helpful! We’ll look into what changed in GitLab’s API and try to get a fix out shortly. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 00:09 李小龙 wrote: > Hi David, > It's

Re: Review Board Ticket #5013: Invalid diff files don't produce error message

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5013/ -- New update by splatter3 For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #5013

Re: GitLab repository create review request failed.

Hi David, It's a self-hosted install. The version of GitLab I am currently using is GitLab Enterprise Edition 10.8.1-ee. Thanks, Li 在2023年12月27日星期三 UTC+8 04:30:27 写道： > Hi, > > Is this a repository hosted on gitlab.com, or a self-hosted install? If > it's self-hosted, do you know what

Re: Completely manual installation

Most of the hostname/IP configuration will just be in your OS/web server configuration. The details of that depend on what you're running. After you do that, if you're changing the domain that the system is accessible on, the one thing that will need to change in Review Board is the "server name"

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >