inor
> release later today to address this. Sorry for the inconvenience!
>
> Regards,
> Barret Rennie
>
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Ľuboš Koščo <tarz...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
> OK
> I am back to 2.5.5 with
> easy_install -U ReviewBoard==2.5.5
> rb-si
PM UTC+2, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
>
> Is there a way to go back to 2.5.5 ?
>
> thnx
> L
>
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:45:57 PM UTC+2, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
>>
>> site was successfully update from 2.5.5
>>
>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:44:58 PM UTC+2, Ľu
Is there a way to go back to 2.5.5 ?
thnx
L
On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:45:57 PM UTC+2, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
>
> site was successfully update from 2.5.5
>
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:44:58 PM UTC+2, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
>>
>> latest ff and latest chromium both
site was successfully update from 2.5.5
On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:44:58 PM UTC+2, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
>
> latest ff and latest chromium both print :
>
> TypeError: RB.CollectionView is undefined
>
> newReviewRequest.min.ccdb21a4925b.js:1
>
> newReviewReque
latest ff and latest chromium both print :
TypeError: RB.CollectionView is undefined
newReviewRequest.min.ccdb21a4925b.js:1
newReviewRequest.min.ccdb21a4925b.js:1
newReviewRequest.min.ccdb21a4925b.js:1:9653
TypeError: RB.NewReviewRequestView is not a constructor
new:612
m.Callbacks/j()
Same thing here, same install
searching for a bug number, e.g. 18757268
workaround is to search for 18757268
or for bug:18757268
though it could be a bit more user friendly and not throw http 500
did someone file a bug to improve this?
thnx
L
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 7:56:43 PM UTC+1,
.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: Ľuboš Koščo tarza...@gmail.com
Reply: Ľuboš Koščo tarza...@gmail.com
Date: March 24, 2015 at 11:59:05 PM
