Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

2019-06-06 Thread Martin Großhauser
Hi Eric, thanks for your reply. As it was not top priority to migrate all the old data to the new version I installed a fresh, empty 3.0 instance and restored the old 1.7 instance to an at least working state for archive purposes. Kind regards, Martin Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2019 19:43:12 UTC+2

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

2019-06-05 Thread 'Eric Johnson' via Review Board Community
On Monday, June 3, 2019 at 7:58:29 AM UTC-7, Martin Großhauser wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. > > Indeed, there was version 1.7.27 from EPEL installed. But the version > running according to the web interface was 1.7.14. Also in the SQL-table > siteconfig_siteconfiguration I see a string

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

2019-06-03 Thread Martin Großhauser
Thanks for your reply. Indeed, there was version 1.7.27 from EPEL installed. But the version running according to the web interface was 1.7.14. Also in the SQL-table siteconfig_siteconfiguration I see a string '1.7.14', which looks to me like the version. Uninstalling the RPM version and

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

2019-06-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM Martin Großhauser wrote: > > I'm trying to upgrade ReviewBoard to 2.0.20, but site-upgrade fails with > output: > > # rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > > The log output below,

site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

2019-06-03 Thread Martin Großhauser
I'm trying to upgrade ReviewBoard to 2.0.20, but site-upgrade fails with output: # rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails.