Are you using a Clear Case SCM? Cleartool is the tool needed to manage
this kind of repo.
If not that means the post-review gives a false positive for a
clearcase repo instead of detecting subversion (I presume this is what
you actually need). Are you sure you are in a subversion repository?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 16:57, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
1. field dependency
2. field state
No success for my proposal ;(. Now I need 4 new fields, how adding them?
--
Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Hum yeah...
I've set up a svn repos in the web interface.
But I access it usually via svn://
(I never heard of Clear Case SCM until now :) )
-Message d'origine-
De : reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
De la part de Bartlomiej Celary
Envoyé : vendredi
I imagine we're trying to detect if it's a clearcase repository and
something with the locale is causing us to fail incorrectly. Possibly a
locale-related issue. What does Le fichier spÚcifiÚ est introuvable
translate to in English?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review
I missed this e-mail entirely. Sorry about that.
We have no plans to add additional fields to Review Board. Custom fields are
often very dependent on the company that wants them, and it's not easy to
just add them directly in the codebase. However, after 1.0, we're putting in
support for
The .reviewboardrc is needed for specifying which server to use, but really
this should be done through a property on the SVN server. See the docs in
the script for details on setting this up.
However, .reviewboardrc isn't related to this. The problem is that we're
attempting to execute the
By the way .reviewboardrc for the filename of config name is not good for
portability because under windows you can't '.reviewboardrc'
It absolutely want somthin like .yy or :(
perhaps alowing a second name for windows could be a good idea too.
somethong like reviewboardrc.conf.
If you
Just tested under linux got this execption:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./post-review, line 2312, in module
main(sys.argv[1:])
File ./post-review, line 2253, in main
repository_info, tool = determine_client()
File ./post-review, line 2205, in determine_client
I'm going to guess you got that error because cleartool isn't installed.
Laurent Dufrechou wrote:
Just tested under linux got this execption:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./post-review, line 2312, in module
main(sys.argv[1:])
File ./post-review, line 2253, in main
Yeah yeah for sure
2009/3/20 Gary M. Josack g...@byoteki.com
I'm going to guess you got that error because cleartool isn't installed.
Laurent Dufrechou wrote:
Just tested under linux got this execption:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./post-review, line 2312, in module
Hello,
Just another thread because this is not related to the exception
handling.
It seems that I misuse post-review.
I was thinking that I had to launch it (wherever I was), and it would
ask me what was my SVN repos, what was my diff file, ans it would send
the update to the server.
Seems it
We'll have to do the try/catch method I suppose. I don't know why you'd be
getting the OSError below. There's something clearly different between the
subprocess implementations we're using. We officially are supporting the
version from python.org, so it's something in the one you're using.
As for
I apologize in advance for the stream of consciousness nature of this email.
But hopefully, it helps.
You can set the reviewboard:url property by doingsvn propedit
reviewboard:url .
inside the directory for the repository using cygwin. When you run
post-review you'll want to be inside that
Hi christian your mail helps me!
svn info gave the URL. I didn't get for what it was used while reading the
doc.
The fact is there is a ' ' space in my repos URL, and it add to be
translated to %20 ... teah I know (I didn't choose the path name ;) )
so I changed the name from
Hum, I think this is official python.
(python(x,y) is just packaging a lot of python install into a one .msi.
And under linux I use the one given by apt-get install under ubuntu 8.10.
That is a 2.5.2
Perhaps you still use older python than 2.5.0?
From python doc:
Exceptions
OK that's better. I decided to first give a try to linux, since it
seems your base platfrom.
I've managed to post my first review that support diff.
Here are some point you could find interesting (as I think I've done
all the basic stupid things a newbie user will do):
First a little exaplantion:
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 973 by jocelyn.fiat: Allow code review without a patch
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=973
Currently code review seems to only work for actually reviewing a patch,
not for reviewing existing code for
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 974 by clarkd4: Clicking anywhere now brings up the comment box,
even expand code links
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=974
Firefox 3.0.7 on Win2003 64-bit. In the latest version of Reviewboard,
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 975 by clarkd4: Launching and moving comment box, backspacing
over text are very slow
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=975
Firefox 3.0.7, Win2003 64-bit. In the latest version of Reviewboard at
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 975 by chipx86: Launching and moving comment box,
backspacing over text are very slow
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=975
What extensions are you using in Firefox?
The textarea is actually just a standard textarea,
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 933
Comment #1 on issue 974 by chipx86: Clicking anywhere now brings up the
comment box, even expand code links
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=974
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Comment #6 on issue 933 by clarkd4: Clicking expand triggers review comment
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=933
For the record, I liked the old behavior that only clicking or
drag-selecting in the
line number column triggers a comment box.
--
You received this message
Comment #2 on issue 975 by clarkd4: Launching and moving comment box,
backspacing over text are very slow
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=975
Yes, both issues go away when I restart the browser. The comment box is
still a
little slow, but not horrible. It might be
Comment #1 on issue 966 by ciaomary: Under General Settings,
updating Server field not saved despite successful message
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=966
Turns out this is not limited to just server field in General Settings.
On a new install of 3-13-09 nightly,
Comment #7 on issue 933 by jefflamb: Clicking expand triggers review comment
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=933
I agree. I like highlighting blocks by click and dragging text when I'm
showing
something to people (or myself.)
--
You received this message because you
25 matches
Mail list logo
