need help to integrate post-review with Perforce

2009-06-09 Thread Amit
Hi, I downloaded RBTools-0.2beta. afterwords i have no clue how to proceed for integrating post-review into Perforce. Any help will be highly appreciated. -Amit --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: need help to integrate post-review with Perforce

2009-06-09 Thread Amit
i am using p4 windows client only. Thanks, Amit On Jun 9, 1:34 pm, Amit agrawalamit2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I downloaded RBTools-0.2beta. afterwords i have no clue how to proceed for integrating post-review into Perforce. Any help will be highly appreciated. -Amit

videos

2009-06-09 Thread saranss...@gmail.com
videos http://jsathiskumar9.blogspot.com http://jsathiskumar9.blogspot.com http://jsathiskumar9.blogspot.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Custom post-review implementations making them easier proposal

2009-06-09 Thread Christian Hammond
Yep, sounds good to me. I'm out of town and am not as available as I normally am, so it might still be a few days before I start reviewing code, but the proposal is good. I have some further thoughts for making post-review more extensible, but I'd need the time to do it properly. What I'd like

Re: fail to post-commit with --revision-range

2009-06-09 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi. Sorry for the late reply on this. I'm out of town and am less responsive than I usually am. So, it looks like you modified the ClearCaseClient part. Is that what you intended? I gathered you're using CVS. The ClearCaseClient part is definitely wrong, so we want to fix that. I'm looking at

Re: Inter-diff broken with more than 2 diff sets.

2009-06-09 Thread Terry Zhong
Gladly, and I've created a review request at http://demo.review-board.org/r/1931/ Where there is an unpublished draft, the contents of all diffs are just the same (that doesn't matter). If you can't see the draft, you can just download the diff and then upload it again to create a draft. The

SCMError: URL 'http://svn/trunk/project/somefile.java' is malformed or the scheme or host or path is missing

2009-06-09 Thread Josh Joy
For some reason I receive the following error, though if I go to the URL directly, I can access the file... Traceback (most recent call last): File /opt/tools/python/v2.6.2/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0rc2-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 152, in view_diff

Re: need help to integrate post-review with Perforce

2009-06-09 Thread kunjal parikh
Is RB installed on Linux or Windows? On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Amit agrawalamit2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I downloaded RBTools-0.2beta. afterwords i have no clue how to proceed for integrating post-review into Perforce. Any help will be highly appreciated. -Amit

Re: Custom post-review implementations making them easier proposal

2009-06-09 Thread Chris Clark
Christian Hammond wrote: ...I also would like an rbapi (or something) package for all the server communication code. This would be separate from RBTools, but RBTools would use it. post-review would be greatly simplified by these two changes. That would be awesome, we've had a couple of

Re: SCMError: URL 'http://svn/trunk/project/somefile.java' is malformed or the scheme or host or path is missing

2009-06-09 Thread Christian Hammond
It's likely that the server isn't understanding svn as a hostname. Maybe try using the fully resolved path in the repository configuration? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Jun 9, 2009

Re: need help to integrate post-review with Perforce

2009-06-09 Thread Christian Hammond
There's a lot of documentation on this at http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Amit

Issue 1153 in reviewboard: 'Ship It' field not shown any more

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High Milestone-Release1.0 Comment #3 on issue 1153 by chipx86: 'Ship It' field not shown any more http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1153 Which database are you using? The ID part does look wrong..

Issue 1153 in reviewboard: 'Ship It' field not shown any more

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #4 on issue 1153 by chipx86: 'Ship It' field not shown any more http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1153 Actually, the ID part looks correct. I take that back. So it's important to find out which database this is, because it's probably specific to that. -- You

Issue 1153 in reviewboard: 'Ship It' field not shown any more

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 1153 by kofemann: 'Ship It' field not shown any more http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1153 I am running MySQL 5.0.51a. I did usual procedure: svn update ./manage.py syncdb this asked me to evolve ./manage.py evolve this asked me to run ./manage.py

Issue 1153 in reviewboard: 'Ship It' field not shown any more

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #6 on issue 1153 by chipx86: 'Ship It' field not shown any more http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1153 Unless you're doing development, you should be using rb-site, which will handle all this for you and will be necessary for future changes to work. You'd need to

Issue 1153 in reviewboard: 'Ship It' field not shown any more

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #7 on issue 1153 by kofemann: 'Ship It' field not shown any more http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1153 oh, right! I did run ./manage.py --execute. It's failed with a complain that some field already exist in some table (unfortunately I do not remember exact

Issue 1153 in reviewboard: 'Ship It' field not shown any more

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #11 on issue 1153 by kofemann: 'Ship It' field not shown any more http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1153 By being a developer myself I know the feeling when you can't reproduce user's reported problem. I will try to be more accurate next time :) -- You received

Issue 1072 in reviewboard: SVN --config-dir support

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #4 on issue 1072 by pinkj9: SVN --config-dir support http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 I'm running on Debian with Apache2, by default the web server runs as www-data with homedir /var/www/. I've changed the ownership and group of this folder to www-data and

Issue 1072 in reviewboard: SVN --config-dir support

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 1072 by vlysenkov: SVN --config-dir support http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 I've tried it with apache2, too. The problem was that despite of running reviewboard scripts as www-data, HOME environment variable was set to /home/vlysenkov, not

Issue 1159 in reviewboard: Bugginess with siteconfig display / fail to save when deleting fields in __init__

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 1159 by subsume: Bugginess with siteconfig display / fail to save when deleting fields in __init__ http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1159 some fields in Fieldset appear that do not above. Ignore these, paste issue. -- You received this message because

Issue 1160 in reviewboard: Unable to view diff for a git repository

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1160 by eallik: Unable to view diff for a git repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1160 I've set up a git repository, uploaded a diff that I'd like to review, but getting: Traceback (most recent

Issue 1162 in reviewboard: post-review ignores all but first target file when using --revision-changes

2009-06-09 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1162 by ssylvis: post-review ignores all but first target file when using --revision-changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1162 What version are you running? CentOS 5.3 Review Board 1.0 RC2