issue after system update, 'Could not import settings 'reviewboard.settings' (Is it on sys.path?): No module named reviewboard.settings'

Hello, I'm using reviewboard (1.0) that I installed on a gentoo box, after updating gentoo packages (apache python all) I get the Review Board is taking a nap page displayed. Looking at apache error log I see this message: Could not import settings 'reviewboard.settings' (Is it on sys.path?):

Review board access issue from client machine...

i have installed Review board on windows (RB + Perforce + SQL) and when i try to access the review board from the server machine ( where i have installed) i can able to successfully post the review request.. but the same thing is failing when i try to post from client machine... RBTools 0.3.2

POST-REVIEW

Hi , Can any one guide me how to use post review command with Review Board. I am having SVN installed on one server and review board on another. How does diff is created automatically. Regards, Udit -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/

Post-review does not function with Subversion

in the command line i typed - post-review - d Output - C:\path to svn checked out\folder\post-review -d RBTools 0.3.2 Home = C:\profile folder\Application Data svn info diff --version repository info: Path: https://indws-gvv76bs.gso.gilbarco.com/svn/svnrepository Base path: /trunk/folder,

Page not found (404) when using post-review after upgrade to V1.6 Beta1

Hi there, We had a perfectly good Windows install of Review Board V1.5.2 but curiosity got the better of me and I attempted to upgrade to V1.6 Beta1. Everything seemed to work great (btw collapsible reviews are awesome) until we tried to post reviews using post-review (RBTools V0.3.2) as Perforce

Reviewboard napping

I installed reviewboard 1.5.5, seemingly successfully, on a fresh CentOS 5.6 install through VirtualBox. I eventually got all the dependencies resolved, including memcached. So now I think it's going to work, right? When I open a browser and go to localhost/my site, I get the Review Board is

Re: Reviewboard napping

Hi, Unit tests won't really run with 'rb-site manage', so that's to be expected. If you're not seeing anything from DEBUG = True, then it sounds like you may have more of an Apache-side problem. Have you looked in the Apache error logs? is this using mod_wsgi, mod_python, or fastcgi? Christian

Re: Post-review does not function with Subversion

There's no error here. What happens if you type that last line on the console manually? I suspect this is a Subversion server-side problem or a network-related problem, not Review Board or post-review. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Review board access issue from client machine...

Hi Ram, I'd need to see that failure HTML content. I'd recommend outputting the results of post-review as an HTML file and attaching it (you can send that attachment directly to me, though conversation should be kept here). What version of Review Board are you running? Christian -- Christian

Re: Page not found (404) when using post-review after upgrade to V1.6 Beta1

Hi Jonathan, So the key part seems to be here: Using changenums on Review Board 1.5.2. Falling back to the deprecated 1.0 API It almost looks like it's still running 1.5.2. Can you go to http://yoursite/reviews/api/info/ and see what version the API is claiming to be? Does that match what you

Re: issue after system update, 'Could not import settings 'reviewboard.settings' (Is it on sys.path?): No module named reviewboard.settings'

Hi, My first suspicion is the Python update. If Apache/mod_python is now on, say, python 2.7, and you were previously using some older version, then Review Board wouldn't be in the same Python path anymore. You'd need to copy it and all dependencies over from the old Python site-packages

Re: Reviewboard napping

Thanks for the quick reply, Christian. We're using mod_python. The apache error logs were paydirt; it looks like some component is still looking at MySQLdb 1.2.1 instead of 1.2.3. I blew away the mysqldb folder at /usr/lib/python2.4/site- packages and replaced it with the MySQLdb folder from

Re: Reviewboard napping

Hi, I believe MySQLdb has to do some compilation. So copying the data won't be enough. I'd blow it all away again, and then do: sudo easy_install -U MySQL-python You'll need the Python development headers. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Automated merge after review continuous integration

#2 would be great; I know a lot of people have requested the ability to have some indication that the patch submitted will (a) apply cleanly and (b) build (maybe even including automated testing). #1 is often requested, but it's something which we've been wary of because of the complexities of

Re: issue after system update, 'Could not import settings 'reviewboard.settings' (Is it on sys.path?): No module named reviewboard.settings'

Hi, you are right, the python update is the cause, I can see that reviewboard package is missing in the /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages directory Now looking up help from my linux distrib. Thanks a lot for helping python newbie On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 13:31, Christian Hammond

Re: Post-review does not function with Subversion

When i type the last line on the console manually C:\path\of\folder\RESOURCESsvn propget reviewboard:url https://server.path.com/svn/svnrepository Authentication realm: https://server.path.com/svn/svnrepository Subversion

Re: Issue 1834 in reviewboard: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations

Comment #9 on issue 1834 by gustavon...@2degreesnetwork.com: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1834 Private organizations do work in v1.5.5, but you have to adjust some settings by hand: Once you have created the

Re: Issue 1834 in reviewboard: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations

Comment #10 on issue 1834 by gustavon...@2degreesnetwork.com: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1834 Sorry, wrong URL. It should be something like:

Re: Issue 1834 in reviewboard: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations

Comment #11 on issue 1834 by gustavon...@2degreesnetwork.com: GitHub support should accommodate GitHub Organizations http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1834 I forgot to mention that the problem is that Review Board sets USERNAME to ORGANIZATION_NAME, ignoring whatever

Issue 2077 in reviewboard: Incorrect git diff parsing

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2077 by a.chuk...@gmail.com: Incorrect git diff parsing http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2077 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support,

Re: Issue 2077 in reviewboard: Incorrect git diff parsing

Comment #1 on issue 2077 by a.chuk...@gmail.com: Incorrect git diff parsing http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2077 I tried different setup for gitweb: either http://hostname/?p=repo.git;a=blob_plain;f=filename;h=revision or

Re: Issue 2077 in reviewboard: Incorrect git diff parsing

Comment #2 on issue 2077 by a.chuk...@gmail.com: Incorrect git diff parsing http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2077 The problem was in repository setup: http://hostname/?p=repo.git;a=blob_plain;f=filename;h=revision or

Issue 2078 in reviewboard: Error loading diff using p4.

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2078 by guneyin...@gmail.com: Error loading diff using p4. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2078 What version are you running? RB 1.5.5 post-review for p4 errors with the following message. If I post