Re: Review Board 1.7.1 released

2012-12-21 Thread pfee
Hi Stephen and Christian, Excellent - thanks for your work. I tried this out on F18 beta, yum install worked without issue. I then issued rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard. I had adjusted unix permissions so that rb-site could create /var/www/reviewboard. I had setup mysql authorisation,

Re: Review Board 1.7.1 released

2012-12-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 12/21/2012 06:18 AM, pfee wrote: Hi Stephen and Christian, Excellent - thanks for your work. I tried this out on F18 beta, yum install worked without issue. I then issued rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard. I had adjusted unix permissions so that rb-site could create

Re: Review Board 1.7.1 released

2012-12-21 Thread pfee
Hi Stephen, Installing python-docutils got past those popup errors, only to reveal similar errors about the lack of markdown. Installing python-markdown fixed this second set of popup errors. rb-site now proceeds to create the DB tables and then runs successfully to completion. Hence that's

Re: Review Board 1.7.1 released

2012-12-21 Thread pfee
Hi Christian, I think my next issue is with ReviewBoard rather than Fedora. The Apache configuration generated by rb-site includes this line: Options -Indexes FollowSymLinks This mixes options starting with +/- with those without a prefix. The documentation for httpd 2.2 warns this can lead

rb-extension-pack - installation and usage?

2012-12-21 Thread Daniel Laird
I just found this pack of extensions and saw the XML Review Extension. However there is little explaining what this does or how it enhances the process of reviewing XML. Can anyone tell me what it adds? I thought I had installed it properly and then looked at a review with XML files and noted

Re: Review Board 1.7.1 released

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2012-12-21 08:37, pfee wrote: I think my next issue is with ReviewBoard rather than Fedora. The Apache configuration generated by rb-site includes this line: Options -Indexes FollowSymLinks This mixes options starting with +/- with those without a prefix. The documentation for httpd 2.2

trouble editing review with code comments

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Woehlke
When I go to edit a review that contains comments made on code, it doesn't seem to be working correctly. It appears at the bottom of the page (not 'over' as expected), I get spinners that never go away where the code should be, and I can't seem to actually edit anything. Is this a known

Re: trouble editing review with code comments

2012-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Matthew, There was a bug in Djblets that caused this. If you upgrade Djblets, this should go away. Christian On Dec 21, 2012, at 13:02, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote: When I go to edit a review that contains comments made on code, it doesn't seem to be working

Re: Review Board 1.7.1 released

2012-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hmm, first time anybody has reported this, and that line has been there for years. I'll make sure to fix it, but it'll only affect new installs. Christian On Dec 21, 2012, at 5:37, pfee p...@talk21.com wrote: Hi Christian, I think my next issue is with ReviewBoard rather than Fedora.

Re: rb-extension-pack - installation and usage?

2012-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Dan, Right now, consider the extension pack as nothing more than examples. The XML one was a sample for better rendering of XML file attachments only. Thumbnails and content. It shouldn't be used yet for practical work, as it doesn't currently allow commenting on XML files. Christian On

Re: trouble editing review with code comments

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2012-12-21 16:23, Christian Hammond wrote: There was a bug in Djblets that caused this. If you upgrade Djblets, this should go away. I upgraded to python-djblets-0.7.7-1.fc18.noarch when I upgraded RB to 1.7.1. Is that not recent enough? (Did I need to do a harder restart than cycling

Re: trouble editing review with code comments

2012-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
It's 0.7.8 that has the fix, unfortunately. Guess you'll need to wait for an official package, or either build your own or install the Python package using easy_install. Christian On Dec 21, 2012, at 14:04, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-12-21 16:23, Christian

Re: trouble editing review with code comments

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2012-12-21 18:59, Christian Hammond wrote: It's 0.7.8 that has the fix, unfortunately. Guess you'll need to wait for an official package, or either build your own or install the Python package using easy_install. Looks like Stephen built it already. Installed it, seems better... Thanks

RB server doing caching a lot

2012-12-21 Thread chuck j
Hi All, We have installed RB server in one of the Linux machine with 8GB of Ram, when i tried free -m command i can see that lots of memory is been consumed for caching due to which the free memory are getting reduced very fast. I have read somewhere that RB does lots of caching, How to avoid

Re: Issue 2831 in reviewboard: Cannot see user name prompt when stdout redirected

2012-12-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2831 by matthew@kitware.com: Cannot see user name prompt when stdout redirected http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2831 Awesome; thanks! (Confirmed fixed on my system also.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Issue 2837 in reviewboard: paste into edit fields doesn't work

2012-12-21 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2837 by matthew@kitware.com: paste into edit fields doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2837 What version are you running? RB 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem?

Re: Issue 2700 in reviewboard: Occasionally cannot save changes made in Edit Review mode

2012-12-21 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2700 by trowb...@gmail.com: Occasionally cannot save changes made in Edit Review mode http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2700 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are