Re: Getting this error while installing RB kindly help

Hi, Sorry, been out of town. Either your database is not copied over, not referenced correctly in settings_local.py, or you have set SITE_ID to something other than 1 in settings_local.py. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag,

Re: Getting this error while installing RB kindly help

Hello Sir, This is my settings_local.py DATABASES = { 'default': { 'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.mysql', 'NAME': 'reviewboard', 'USER': 'root', 'PASSWORD': '', 'HOST': 'localhost', 'PORT': '3307', }, } # Unique secret key. Don't share

Path to server is not sticking

Hi I have a reviewboard installation set up on a machine here, and when I set the path to the server in the general settings, it doesn't stay. If I set it, then come back later the value will be set to http://localhost; How do I fix this? -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at

Re: Path to server is not sticking

It's possible the old value is being cached. Can you try changing it again and then restarting Apache, see if that fixes it? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:39

Re: RBTools 5.x API: Can it be used to modify database?

Ah, a light bulb just went on. I was missing the link between the new RBTools API and the web resources. After reading your message I went back and read more carefully the section titled Links Between Resources. Things are starting to make more sense to me now. Thanks! --Steve On

Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears that there was a change in reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to search anonymously

Re: Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

I found that it was easiest to simply copy the code from the authenticator closest to what I want,ed and then customize as needed. Then select the new authenticator as your custom option. Eric On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Kan danielk...@gmail.com wrote: I am using RB 1.7.x with an

RBTools0.4.3 posts a review in publish state even if a reviewer information is not provided.

Hi Team, I just want to confirm that with RBTools0.4.3 we are able to publish a review with -p option, even if a reviewer information(user/group) is not provided. It shouldn't allow the review to be published right ? regards, Satish Singh -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at

Re: RBTools0.4.3 posts a review in publish state even if a reviewer information is not provided.

What version of Review Board? -David On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:33 AM, satish singh trivi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Team, I just want to confirm that with RBTools0.4.3 we are able to publish a review with -p option, even if a reviewer information(user/group) is not provided. It shouldn't

Issue 3099 in reviewboard: Some Unciode characters not supported in issue comments

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3099 by dhwil...@gmail.com: Some Unciode characters not supported in issue comments http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3099 What version are you running? 1.7.13 What's the URL of the page containing the

Re: Issue 3099 in reviewboard: Some Unciode characters not supported in issue comments

Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #1 on issue 3099 by trowb...@gmail.com: Some Unciode characters not supported in issue comments http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3099 We do support unicode comments, but only when the database supports unicode. Unfortunately,