Hi Sara,
Definitely looks like a bug in how we're representing the revisions. Would you
be able to file a bug and provide a full diff (of a trivial file or something)
that we can use to reproduce the problem?
Thanks,
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board -
Done. Note that I was unable to attach the diffs to the bug as Issue
attachment quota exceeded but they are very short, and I included the
contents.
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3573thanks=3573ts=1411132852
Thanks.
Sara
On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:10:12 AM
Hi there,
I saw screenshots where the repository branches show up in the lower half
of the New Review Request section. This was also mentioned in the
documentation.
Currently we are running version 2.0.7 of Review Board and have two
repositories which are hosted on the same server. They are
The post-commit UI is currently only available for GitHub and SVN
repositories. Support for more types of repositories will come in future
versions.
Which repository type are you using?
-David
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Hans Raaf oder...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I saw screenshots
Yeah... we're having a lot of trouble getting Google to bump up our very
limited attachment quota.
We might be switching bug trackers in the future.
Thanks for the bug!
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. -
Hi,
I created the docker version of reviewboard, which is more configurable
than the ones I found on the docker hub. If anyone is interested, welcome!
https://github.com/ikatson/docker-reviewboard
Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up
Very cool!
Would you be interested in adding this to the RB Package Store at
https://www.reviewboard.org/store/ ? We're hoping to build that out as a common
place to find first- and third-party integrations and extensions for Review
Board, and this would be an interesting addition.
Christian
No problem, added here https://www.reviewboard.org/store/products/7/,
waiting moderation.
On Friday, September 19, 2014 2:21:34 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Very cool!
Would you be interested in adding this to the RB Package Store at
https://www.reviewboard.org/store/ ? We're hoping
Hi David
Thanks the problem was in the repo name . I didnt use the root path in svn
info
Thanks
Arjun
On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 12:05:50 UTC-7, Arjun A.M. wrote:
Hello
I have got my reviewboard working but I am facing problems with rbt post.
If I do a rbt diff I get the correct
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3573 by sararayb...@gmail.com: Git style mercurial diffs with
file renames don't work
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3573
What version are you running?
RB 2.0.7
What's the URL of the page
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3574 by jan_sjo...@yahoo.com: Add support in post-review for p4
imported files (integration from remote depot)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3574
*** For customer support, please post to
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3575 by danie...@gmail.com: Tabs are not displayed correctly
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3575
What version are you running?
1.6.9
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3575 by trowb...@gmail.com: Tabs are not displayed
correctly
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3575
We can't look at your internal review board server, but I will say that
1.6.9 is *very* old, and that 2.0.x especially
Comment #4 on issue 3108 by justy...@gmail.com: APIErrors return 403 but do
not log anything
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3108
Looking into this for an Easy Bug fix.
--- Justin Maillet
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #4 on issue 3478 by alexey.n...@gmail.com: Allow disabling Markdown
through an option/checkbox
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3478
Please make a setting to disable markdown. The ``` workaround doesn't work
very well as RB then attempts to perform the syntax
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7 failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3576 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7
failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
That stacktrace shows that you're still running Review Board 1.7.20, but
now with a 2.0.7 database. You'll need
Comment #3 on issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7
failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
ls /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-
ReviewBoard-1.7.20-py2.6.egg/ ReviewBoard-2.0.7-py2.6.egg/
--
You received this message because
Comment #4 on issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7
failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
Hmm... I've uninstall reviewboard dependencies from scratch installed
it again.
I've restarted the web server memchached. Yet the stack trace
Comment #5 on issue 3576 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7
failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
Are you using Apache, or just nginx?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Comment #6 on issue 3576 by vlov...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7
failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
I think I found it. I'm using just nginx uwsgi is still running. Can't
figure out who owns that process, but I'll figure it out. Thanks.
Any
Comment #7 on issue 3576 by chip...@gmail.com: Upgrade from 1.7.20 to 2.0.7
failed
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3576
easy_install doesn't actually remove old versions of packages, since
generally-speaking, Python modules of different versions can be
co-installed
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3577 by niranjja...@gmail.com: Provide review as separate tar ball
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3577
Hi,
Installing Review Board separately on a server behind firewall and no
access for internet
23 matches
Mail list logo