Re: Issue 3890 in reviewboard: Didn't apply patch cleanly when using rbt post --parent in mercurial
Comment #1 on issue 3890 by ronald.c...@visiercorp.com: Didn't apply patch cleanly when using rbt post --parent in mercurial https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3890 A one-liner to replace rbi post --parent A is: rbt diff --parent A | perl -pe 's/^(diff -r \w+) -r \w+/\1/g' | rbt post --diff-filename=- -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Issue 3886 in reviewboard: Username bigger than 40 characters
Updates: Status: New Comment #3 on issue 3886 by trowb...@gmail.com: Username bigger than 40 characters https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3886 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
Hi John,
Django's dumpdata/loaddata cannot scale. Do you still have a copy of the
old database? We have replacements for loaddata/dumpdata that do scale.
Are you trying to convert from one database type to another?
Christian
On Friday, June 19, 2015, John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I work around this?
# rb-site manage /var/www/reviews.tintri.com loaddata
/tmp/reviews-charles2_rb20_data.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==2.0.15', 'console_scripts', 'rb-site'
)()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1885, in main
command.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1814, in run
site.run_manage_command(args[0], args[1:])
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 662, in run_manage_command
execute_from_command_line([__file__, cmd] + params)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 399, in execute_from_command_line
utility.execute()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 392, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py,
line 242, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py,
line 285, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 55, in handle
self.loaddata(fixture_labels)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 84, in loaddata
self.load_label(fixture_label)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 134, in load_label
for obj in objects:
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/serializers/json.py,
line 65, in Deserializer
stream_or_string = stream_or_string.read()
MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
'/tmp/reviews-charles2_rb20_data.json':
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3893 in reviewboard: Name, Username, and Password fields for repositories need new form field names
Status: Confirmed Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release2.0.x Component-Admin New issue 3893 by chip...@gmail.com: Name, Username, and Password fields for repositories need new form field names https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3893 What version are you running? 2.0.x What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://localhost:8080/admin/db/scmtools/repository/add/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. In Safari 7.x (or probably other browsers), fill out some form somewhere else that saves a name. Also, fill out the login form on Review Board, saving the username and password. 2. Go to add or edit a repository. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? On some browsers (older versions of Safari, certainly), the Name, Username, and Password fields are filled in by the browser, which is not desired. We have flags set to prevent this, but they can be ignored. We should rename the form field names (name=...) to prevent these from being filled in. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: email issue on RB group vs people
a) you're sure it's empty? no whitespace in there? b) you're sure everyone is a member of that group? -David On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:18 PM, MoonWalker daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com wrote: it is empty On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 12:12:44 PM UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote: Please check the group configuration and check that the mailing list field is empty. -David On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:02 PM MoonWalker daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: David, I setup the mail server (Settings - Email - EMail Server - Mail Server). I was under the impression that once that I establish the members of a group, RB will send an email to all the group members, but that is not the case. I have to add them to the People to have the expected result. Do I need to configure anything else on RB ? On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 10:14:18 AM UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote: Does the group have a mailing list configured? If so, e-mail to that group will be sent only to the list and not to the group members. -David On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:11 PM, MoonWalker daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: I have noticed this issue since several versions, not sure if this is a know issue or something else in my configuration, but basically in Reviewers I need to add each team member to People, because if I add the group they wont receive any email. not sure why. All these people are part of the same group, but still not email. BTW I am using the latest RB version -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
If you're just moving between databases, you'll want to use mysqldump, and then
use the mysql command line to import it. This is the safest, fastest, most
straight-forward way to migrate between MySQL servers.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Date: June 19, 2015 at 3:08:25 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Cc: christ...@beanbaginc.com christ...@beanbaginc.com
Subject: Re: MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 2:56:15 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi John,
Django's dumpdata/loaddata cannot scale. Do you still have a copy of the
old database? We have replacements for loaddata/dumpdata that do scale.
Are you trying to convert from one database type to another?
Christian
On Friday, June 19, 2015, John Schmitt marma...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
How do I work around this?
# rb-site manage /var/www/reviews.tintri.com loaddata
/tmp/reviews-charles2_rb20_data.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==2.0.15', 'console_scripts', 'rb-site'
)()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1885, in main
command.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1814, in run
site.run_manage_command(args[0], args[1:])
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 662, in run_manage_command
execute_from_command_line([__file__, cmd] + params)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 399, in execute_from_command_line
utility.execute()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 392, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py,
line 242, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py,
line 285, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 55, in handle
self.loaddata(fixture_labels)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 84, in loaddata
self.load_label(fixture_label)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 134, in load_label
for obj in objects:
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/serializers/json.py
, line 65, in Deserializer
stream_or_string = stream_or_string.read()
MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
'/tmp/reviews-charles2_rb20_data.json':
I'm not converting databases. I do have a copy of the old database on the
old installation.
What are the replacements? I'm moving from an old mysql-based installation
to a new one.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard
group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board 2.0.16 is released, with security fixes and more
Hi Paul, Thanks for reporting this. I went through our caching code, and I'm not really sure why this is happening off-hand. Were you able to fix this by clearing your browser cache, or did you have to restart memcached? Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Paul Fee paul.f@gmail.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: June 18, 2015 at 9:45:59 AM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Review Board 2.0.16 is released, with security fixes and more Hi Christian, I'm seeing some buggy behaviour around the caching of diffs. It looks like a server side problem as the buggy diff content persists even if I reload with CTRL-F5 or switch browsers (e.g. firefox to chromium). Steps to reproduce: 1. Change some code, I happen to be using SVN. 2. Upload diff to existing review. $ rbt post -r XXX svn_changelist 3. View the draft interdiff, all it ok at this point. 4. Change the code some more without publishing draft changes. 5. Upload diff again, should change content of draft diff. $ rbt post -r XXX svn_changelist 6. View the draft interdiff - BUG - diff content on web page is from first upload, changes from second rbt post are not displayed. From the 2.0.16 release notes, If a diff has already been viewed once, by anyone, it will be quicker to retrieve and display.. I suspect the draft is being cached. A blunt fix could be to avoid caching diffs for drafts. A better fix would be to invalidate caches for draft diffs when a new diffset is uploaded. Hopefully those steps are clear enough for you to reproduce the issue. Let me know if you need more information. Thanks, Paul -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: rb-site upgrade help needed
Hi John,
Try upgrading to Django Evolution 0.7.5, restore the backup, and try the
migration again. I believe you hit a bug we had already fixed.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Date: June 17, 2015 at 10:10:46 PM
To: Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
Cc: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: rb-site upgrade help needed
I do have a backup.
python-django-evolution-0.7.4-1.el7.noarch
evolution-data-server-3.8.5-34.el7.x86_64
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
What version of django_evolution do you have?
Do you have a database backup?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Date: June 17, 2015 at 6:35:54 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: rb-site upgrade help needed
I need help getting my data from ReviewBoard 1.5 to 2.0 to migrate. Can
anyone tell me what to do to make this work?
Thank you.
[root@dyn40-25-217 ~]# mysql -p reviewboard.dump
Enter password:
[root@dyn40-25-217 ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews.tintri.com
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 1.5.5 to 2.0.15
There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
There are unapplied evolutions for contenttypes.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs.
There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
There are unapplied evolutions for site.
Adding baseline version for new models
Evolutions in attachments baseline: file_attachment_orig_filename,
file_attachment_file_max_length_512, file_attachment_repo_info,
file_attachment_repo_path_no_index,
file_attachment_repo_revision_max_length_64
Evolutions in site baseline: localsite_public
Evolutions in hostingsvcs baseline: account_hosting_url,
account_hosting_url_max_length_255, account_unique_together_baseline
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
Registering new SCM Tool Plastic SCM (reviewboard.scmtools.plastic.
PlasticTool) in database
CommandError: Error applying evolution: (1050, Table
'reviews_review_file_attachment_comments' already exists)
If I restart httpd at this point, I'll see this in /var/log/messages:
Jun 17 18:26:49 localhost rb-site: -- begin log output
--
Jun 17 18:26:49 localhost rb-site: Creating tables ...
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
auth.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
contenttypes.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
accounts.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
changedescs.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
diffviewer.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
reviews.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: There are unapplied evolutions for
scmtools.
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: Project signature has changed - an
evolution is required
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: Installing custom SQL ...
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: Installing indexes ...
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: Installed 0 object(s) from 0
fixture(s)
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: Traceback (most recent call last):
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in
module
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site:
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==2.0.15',
'console_scripts', 'rb-site')()
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py, line
1885,
in main
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: command.run()
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py, line
1694,
in run
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: site.migrate_database()
Jun 17 18:26:50 localhost rb-site: File
Re: Issue 3887 in reviewboard: Perforce diff submission is broken in 2.0.17
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 3887 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Perforce diff submission is broken in 2.0.17 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3887 A fix for this has landed on release-2.0.x as 6cc72eb8c3ee7a219b5d7656aa791b2feb976223. This will ship in Review Board 2.0.18. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ImportError: No module named urllib.parse
Hey Stephen, I haven't been able to look into this yet (and will be out for a few days), but is this something that we can patch in our tree? Or is it a bug in six? If it's something we can fix in RBTools, then we can just fix it and get a new release out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: June 19, 2015 at 7:21:19 AM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: ImportError: No module named urllib.parse On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:33:55 PM UTC-7, Barret Rennie wrote: Hi John, Yes thats what I mean. I’ll take a look at it. Can you tell me what version of six is installed? python-six-1.3.0-4.el7.noarch OK, so we have a problem here (and one I'm really embarassed not to have noticed; I usually just bump and rebuild RBTools on EPEL 7 assuming it will continue to work there the same way that it does on EPEL 6. Well, it turns out that EPEL 6 has a newer version of python-six than RHEL 7 does, and RBTools is completely broken on the latter platform because of it. (RHEL/CentOS 7.1 only ships with python-six 1.3.0 and the six.move.urllib.parse support was added in python-six 1.4.0) The good news is that RHEL/CentOS 7.2 should include python-six 1.9.0[1]. The bad news is that's a ways out, so this will be broken in the meantime. I have two choices: 1) Revert RBTools back to a version prior to this requirement. That looks like 0.6.3, which is almost certainly not a good idea. 2) Ship RBTools broken in the standard repository and direct people to pull an unofficial python-six package from a COPR repository. I'm going to go with 2) for now, updating the version of RBTools in EPEL to have an explicit requirement on python-six = 1.4 so that it won't be installable without using my COPR repository until RHEL 7.2 is released. Given that RBTools has been broken like this for months, I suspect this won't actually affect a great many people, but I'd still like to ask that the Review Board devs add a note in the online documentation pointing people to drop https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/EPEL7-rbtools/repo/epel-7/sgallagh-EPEL7-rbtools-epel-7.repo into /etc/yum.repos.d until RHEL 7.2 is released. This repository will contain only a rebased python-six package. It'll be available in a couple hours (right now, there's an unplanned outage going on causing COPR builds to fail). [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185409 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Disable the ship it button?
Hi Terrence, There's no support for this yet. Short-term, one option would be to add a tiny extension that injects some CSS to hide that element. Longer-term, I want to make that list of actions something that are formally registered and tracked, so that an extension can simply say Remove Ship It and be done. Probably a post-2.5.0 thing at this point. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Dunnigan, Terrence J terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: June 19, 2015 at 7:52:28 AM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Disable the ship it button? Hi all, Is there a way in any current or future Review Board release to disable the Ship it menu item? By disable I mean hide it, don't display it, or keep it in the menu bar and just grey it out. Terry -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Issue 3887 in reviewboard: Perforce diff submission is broken in 2.0.17
Comment #7 on issue 3887 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Perforce diff submission is broken in 2.0.17 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3887 It is actually fixed in cb9a791e722c161d7e06f1add407e180aa025586. I copied the wrong revision. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ImportError: No module named urllib.parse
This isn't something we can work around in RBTools (at least not without regressing in our python 3.x compatibility). The problem is that older versions of six didn't ship moves for all of the urllib/urllib2 changes. -David On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hey Stephen, I haven't been able to look into this yet (and will be out for a few days), but is this something that we can patch in our tree? Or is it a bug in six? If it's something we can fix in RBTools, then we can just fix it and get a new release out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: June 19, 2015 at 7:21:19 AM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: ImportError: No module named urllib.parse On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:33:55 PM UTC-7, Barret Rennie wrote: Hi John, Yes thats what I mean. I’ll take a look at it. Can you tell me what version of six is installed? python-six-1.3.0-4.el7.noarch OK, so we have a problem here (and one I'm really embarassed not to have noticed; I usually just bump and rebuild RBTools on EPEL 7 assuming it will continue to work there the same way that it does on EPEL 6. Well, it turns out that EPEL 6 has a newer version of python-six than RHEL 7 does, and RBTools is completely broken on the latter platform because of it. (RHEL/CentOS 7.1 only ships with python-six 1.3.0 and the six.move.urllib.parse support was added in python-six 1.4.0) The good news is that RHEL/CentOS 7.2 should include python-six 1.9.0[1]. The bad news is that's a ways out, so this will be broken in the meantime. I have two choices: 1) Revert RBTools back to a version prior to this requirement. That looks like 0.6.3, which is almost certainly not a good idea. 2) Ship RBTools broken in the standard repository and direct people to pull an unofficial python-six package from a COPR repository. I'm going to go with 2) for now, updating the version of RBTools in EPEL to have an explicit requirement on python-six = 1.4 so that it won't be installable without using my COPR repository until RHEL 7.2 is released. Given that RBTools has been broken like this for months, I suspect this won't actually affect a great many people, but I'd still like to ask that the Review Board devs add a note in the online documentation pointing people to drop https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/EPEL7-rbtools/repo/epel-7/sgallagh-EPEL7-rbtools-epel-7.repo into /etc/yum.repos.d until RHEL 7.2 is released. This repository will contain only a rebased python-six package. It'll be available in a couple hours (right now, there's an unplanned outage going on causing COPR builds to fail). [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185409 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3892 in reviewboard: Documentation for setting up Trac is wrong
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Component-Docs New issue 3892 by gzau...@gmail.com: Documentation for setting up Trac is wrong https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3892 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/admin/configuration/repositories/ Describe the problem and any recommendations below. Given example for setting up Trac is wrong. It should say: - Trac: http://trac.example.com/ Please provide any additional information below. I had issue with setting up Trac in ReviewBoard. When I googled I found this link that helped me; https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3033#c13 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ImportError: No module named settings_local
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com wrote: I can run # rb-site manage --help just fine. But, taking the help literally, I get this when I try: # rb-site manage -- --help ... 'manage' command: Runs a Django management command on the site. Usage: `rb-site manage path command -- arguments.` Run `manage -- --help` for the list of commands. This help dialog is incorrect. It needs to read: Run `rb-site manage path -- --help` for the list I just verified (with the exact same version on RHEL 7 installed via EPEL 7) that this works correctly. Please file a bug on the incorrect help text there. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ImportError: No module named urllib.parse
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM John Schmitt marmalo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:33:55 PM UTC-7, Barret Rennie wrote: Hi John, Yes thats what I mean. I’ll take a look at it. Can you tell me what version of six is installed? python-six-1.3.0-4.el7.noarch OK, so we have a problem here (and one I'm really embarassed not to have noticed; I usually just bump and rebuild RBTools on EPEL 7 assuming it will continue to work there the same way that it does on EPEL 6. Well, it turns out that EPEL 6 has a newer version of python-six than RHEL 7 does, and RBTools is completely broken on the latter platform because of it. (RHEL/CentOS 7.1 only ships with python-six 1.3.0 and the six.move.urllib.parse support was added in python-six 1.4.0) The good news is that RHEL/CentOS 7.2 should include python-six 1.9.0[1]. The bad news is that's a ways out, so this will be broken in the meantime. I have two choices: 1) Revert RBTools back to a version prior to this requirement. That looks like 0.6.3, which is almost certainly not a good idea. 2) Ship RBTools broken in the standard repository and direct people to pull an unofficial python-six package from a COPR repository. I'm going to go with 2) for now, updating the version of RBTools in EPEL to have an explicit requirement on python-six = 1.4 so that it won't be installable without using my COPR repository until RHEL 7.2 is released. Given that RBTools has been broken like this for months, I suspect this won't actually affect a great many people, but I'd still like to ask that the Review Board devs add a note in the online documentation pointing people to drop https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/EPEL7-rbtools/repo/epel-7/sgallagh-EPEL7-rbtools-epel-7.repo into /etc/yum.repos.d until RHEL 7.2 is released. This repository will contain only a rebased python-six package. It'll be available in a couple hours (right now, there's an unplanned outage going on causing COPR builds to fail). [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185409 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Reviewing without a Source control Repo: Uploading changes?
Thank you Christian: That matches what we seemed to have figured, but is disappointing. We're using Clearcase (moving to Perforce soon... hopefully), but are unable to install the Clearcase client on the Reviewboard evaluation machine as our IT does not support Clearcase under Linux. Luciano On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 2:03:25 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Luciano, Review Board requires a connected, supported repository in order to view diffs. If you don't have a supported repository, a pre-generated diff won't help. What are you currently using for source control? Christian On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Luciano Moretti luciano...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: We're trying to evaluate Reviewboard but cannot integrate it with our current Source Control system. We are switching source control soon to one that can be integrated. Currently, we've got a review started and the initiator has made changes to the files, but we can't figure out how to upload a pre-generated diff to the review (or the new version of the file for Reviewboard itself to do the diff). -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Disable the ship it button?
Hi all, Is there a way in any current or future Review Board release to disable the Ship it menu item? By disable I mean hide it, don't display it, or keep it in the menu bar and just grey it out. Terry -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Issue 3886 in reviewboard: Username bigger than 40 characters
Comment #2 on issue 3886 by di...@microdice.net: Username bigger than 40 characters https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3886 The LDAP module uses this as the login, I guess the LDAP module is the one that needs to be modified then. How do I open against this ? -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
How do I work around this?
# rb-site manage /var/www/reviews.tintri.com loaddata
/tmp/reviews-charles2_rb20_data.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==2.0.15', 'console_scripts', 'rb-site')()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1885, in main
command.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1814, in run
site.run_manage_command(args[0], args[1:])
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 662, in run_manage_command
execute_from_command_line([__file__, cmd] + params)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py
, line 399, in execute_from_command_line
utility.execute()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py
, line 392, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py,
line 242, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py,
line 285, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 55, in handle
self.loaddata(fixture_labels)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 84, in loaddata
self.load_label(fixture_label)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/loaddata.py
, line 134, in load_label
for obj in objects:
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/serializers/json.py,
line 65, in Deserializer
stream_or_string = stream_or_string.read()
MemoryError: Problem installing fixture
'/tmp/reviews-charles2_rb20_data.json':
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
