rb-site install should be responsible for creating the site directory,
which is separate from the Review Board package's contents. There must not
be anything at the location you're trying to install to.
It's also crucial that you allow it to generate the settings_local.py file.
The SECRET_KEY
Hello,
Review Board 2.5.6.1
There is a file with text in windows-1251 encoding in SVN. I commit string
with russian letters. When I create a review request from “Create from a
local change”. Then I try to see diff.
RB shows error:
There was an error displaying this diff.
The patch to
So here's what I know:
Our SVN server is running VisualSVN Enterprise Edition rather than svnserve
Integrated Windows Authentication is a feature of that product, and
currently, if it's enabled, it's the only authentication method allowed.
I've run kinit on the server where I'm trying to install
Hi Chris,
The extra_data column in diffviewer_filediff table has the info but not for
all. for some rows it has "patched_sha1" and for some rows it has info
like{"raw_insert_count": 0, "raw_delete_count": 1}. Unfortunately it doesnt
helps. anywhere it stores the "patched_sha1" info for each
I've updated the image, and the README with a better usage guide.
Docker Hub image link: https://hub.docker.com/r/ovidiub13/reviewboard/
vineri, 8 iulie 2016, 14:18:37 UTC+3, Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN a scris:
>
> Hello,
> I've managed to fix it. Apparently there are 2 ext directories, one in
>
Hello,
I've managed to fix it. Apparently there are 2 ext directories, one in
media and one in static.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us
Hey Stephen, Cathy,
Trying to educate myself on this... I'd love to get some sanity-checking
and additional details on how this works.
I dug through the Subversion and serf source code. It looks like libsvn
handles doing SPNEGO on our behalf, so long as the user has run kinit at
some point. What
Hi,
Thanks. I'd definitely like to get proper support for self-signed certs
going in Review Board. The reason it wasn't there before is that it's been
only somewhat recently that Python's HTTPS support even cared about proper
certificate verification. We didn't used to have to worry about it. We
I'm sorry it's proving to be a complicated tool for your usage... That's
definitely not our goal, though this is the first time we've had a request
to support Kerberos with Subversion. Just not a common setup. Most use SSH
keys or username/password for authentication, and have no problem getting
