Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

Christian, "Team Foundation Server" and "Team Foundation Server (git)" are the only two entries in the "Repository type" drop down list. I can no longer see anything obvious in the "D:\ProgramFiles\Bitnami\reviewboard-2.5.9-0\apache2\logs\error.log" log file. On Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

Hi Damien, Can you check for more errors in the logs, and show me a listing of everything in the repository type list? Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:10 PM,

Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

Christian, I have downloaded and installed a new version of pytz, I can now see all the other authentication types available and have event configured AD authentication successfully. However there is still no SVN option available for selection. This is the case on two separate installations.

Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

That's the problem then. An incompatible pytz is installed. When there's a version conflict like this, it impacts anything scanned via Python entrypoints, preventing them from loading. If you can resolve this by upgrading pytz, the problem will go away. It's entirely possible that Bitnami is

Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

One the http://reviewboard.corp/reviewboard/admin/settings/authentication/ page, I have "Standard Registration" and "Legacy Authentication Module" available. BTW, I have reviewed the logs and see the following error occurring (once again, while I have experience in many other languages, python

Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

Hi, It's definitely an issue with the installation. The Python entrypoints are likely not registered in the environment, and that's on their end. Entrypoints are a Python feature allowing applications/modules to register entries in a common place that can be looked up by other

Re: SVN Setup on Bitnami Windows distribution. No SVN/Subversion "Repository type" selectable.

Christian, Thanks for the response. Unfortunately Bitnami refers to reviewboard.org for resolution. While the following link is not my post, it is exactly the issue that I am facing https://community.bitnami.com/t/how-can-i-select-subversion-from-repository-type-list/47824 I will add a comment

Re: RBTools Ticket #4546: rbt diff is different from svn diff

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4546/ -- New update by totoroliu For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #4546 Reply:

Re: Error: too many trys to get lock

Thanks for the quick reply Christian! I see apache did not have write access to the data folder. I enabled it and will watch for future errors. Thanks! --DK On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I haven't, but the first thing

Re: Error: too many trys to get lock

Hi Daniel, I haven't, but the first thing I'd check is whether that directory and its contents are writable by the web server. There's going to be a new Review Board release out by the end of the week that, amongst other things, makes some large improvements (and has better error handling) for

Error: too many trys to get lock

I'm getting this error on our production RB server. We are using P4 with LDAP authentication. SCMError: [P4#run] Errors during command execution( "p4 login" ) [Error]: "Fatal client error; disconnecting!\nOperation 'client-SetPassword' failed.\nToo many trys to get lock

Re: Upgrading ReviewBoard on CentOS 6.4

CentOS 6 does not natively (via RPMs) provide all of the dependencies that ReviewBoard 2.0+ requires. It is EOL in EPEL 6. If you would like to upgrade, I recommend upgrading your host OS to CentOS 7. If you cannot do that, you should remove the ReviewBoard RPMs and use the pip-installed version

Upgrading ReviewBoard on CentOS 6.4

Hi Team, I have installed the Review Board on CentOS 6.4 with the command 'yum install ReviewBoard` However this has installed the older version with 1.7. We would like to upgrade to the latest available version of ReviewBoard to gain the latest features. I am following the below document to