Re: Review Board 3.0 beta 2 is out -- beta testers needed!

2017-10-09 Thread Christian Hammond
The expectation is that we'll have a single RC release, based on our usage so far. Christian On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, MoonWalker wrote: > I am guessing that base on the testers feedback we way see additional RCs > before the final release > > On Tuesday,

Re: Jenkins CI integration on RB 3 Plz

2017-10-09 Thread Christian Hammond
Yeah, our integrations are actually not part of the Review Board code base. They live in a rbintegrations package, which we'll be maintaining and releasing separately from Review Board, so that it's not dependent on the Review Board release cycle as much. Christian On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:28

Re: Jenkins CI integration on RB 3 Plz

2017-10-09 Thread MoonWalker
BTW IMO plugins/extensions is the way to go, since it can extend RB functionality without messing around with RB core On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:10:24 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi, > > I definitely want to do Jenkins support. It won't happen by 3.0 but it's > on my radar.

Re: Jenkins CI integration on RB 3 Plz

2017-10-09 Thread MoonWalker
IMO Jenkins is by far one of the most well Known and used CI and adding it will really help boost you guys On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:10:24 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi, > > I definitely want to do Jenkins support. It won't happen by 3.0 but it's > on my radar. Supporting

Re: Review Board 3.0 beta 2 is out -- beta testers needed!

2017-10-09 Thread MoonWalker
I am guessing that base on the testers feedback we way see additional RCs before the final release On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:12:20 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote: > > The plan is to get RC1 out in 2-3 weeks, based on what bugs get reported > to us. This is basically what we'll end

Re: Review Board 3.0 beta 2 is out -- beta testers needed!

2017-10-09 Thread Christian Hammond
The plan is to get RC1 out in 2-3 weeks, based on what bugs get reported to us. This is basically what we'll end up shipping as 3.0 (minus some docs and bug fixes/visual polish). So if you'd like, you can install RC1 when it's out. Just test first on a non-production server. Christian On Mon,

Re: Jenkins CI integration on RB 3 Plz

2017-10-09 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, I definitely want to do Jenkins support. It won't happen by 3.0 but it's on my radar. Supporting another CI system requires a lot of work, so we still have to see what's involved. There's also a question of what we'll be shipping with Review Board and what we'll be shipping with Power Pack,

Re: Review Board 3.0 beta 2 is out -- beta testers needed!

2017-10-09 Thread MoonWalker
When do you guys think that RB 3 will be *ready* for production? On Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 4:15:54 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > We just put out a release of Review Board 3.0 beta 2. There's a lot of new > features in this release, and at this point we're

Jenkins CI integration on RB 3 Plz

2017-10-09 Thread MoonWalker
I read that RB 3 beta 2 added support for Travis CI and Circle CI. Could you please add support for Jenkins as well. Not sure if that can be done with Webhooks in the mean time -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-09 Thread Christian Hammond
Can you send me the fields.py file as you now have it? That output contradicts the logic that should be in the code. Christian On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 03:29 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard < reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > See the new output below... > > Removing all

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-09 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Hi Christian, See the new output below... Removing all documents from your index because you said so. All documents removed. Indexing 558 users Indexing 27878 review requests ERROR:root:Error updating reviews using default Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: uglifyjs

2017-10-09 Thread Erik Johansson
Hi, I just noticed that when running ".../djblets % python setup.py develop" you now get the warning: npm WARN deprecated uglifyjs@2.4.10: uglifyjs is deprecated - use uglify-js instead. Perhaps this is something you would like to look into before 3.0? There's also a warning about