The expectation is that we'll have a single RC release, based on our usage
so far.
Christian
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, MoonWalker
wrote:
> I am guessing that base on the testers feedback we way see additional RCs
> before the final release
>
> On Tuesday,
Yeah, our integrations are actually not part of the Review Board code base.
They live in a rbintegrations package, which we'll be maintaining and
releasing separately from Review Board, so that it's not dependent on the
Review Board release cycle as much.
Christian
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:28
BTW IMO plugins/extensions is the way to go, since it can extend RB
functionality without messing around with RB core
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:10:24 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I definitely want to do Jenkins support. It won't happen by 3.0 but it's
> on my radar.
IMO Jenkins is by far one of the most well Known and used CI and adding it
will really help boost you guys
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:10:24 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I definitely want to do Jenkins support. It won't happen by 3.0 but it's
> on my radar. Supporting
I am guessing that base on the testers feedback we way see additional RCs
before the final release
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 8:12:20 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> The plan is to get RC1 out in 2-3 weeks, based on what bugs get reported
> to us. This is basically what we'll end
The plan is to get RC1 out in 2-3 weeks, based on what bugs get reported to
us. This is basically what we'll end up shipping as 3.0 (minus some docs
and bug fixes/visual polish). So if you'd like, you can install RC1 when
it's out. Just test first on a non-production server.
Christian
On Mon,
Hi,
I definitely want to do Jenkins support. It won't happen by 3.0 but it's on
my radar. Supporting another CI system requires a lot of work, so we still
have to see what's involved. There's also a question of what we'll be
shipping with Review Board and what we'll be shipping with Power Pack,
When do you guys think that RB 3 will be *ready* for production?
On Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 4:15:54 AM UTC+11, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We just put out a release of Review Board 3.0 beta 2. There's a lot of new
> features in this release, and at this point we're
I read that RB 3 beta 2 added support for Travis CI and Circle CI. Could
you please add support for Jenkins as well. Not sure if that can be done
with Webhooks in the mean time
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review
Can you send me the fields.py file as you now have it? That output
contradicts the logic that should be in the code.
Christian
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 03:29 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> See the new output below...
>
> Removing all
Hi Christian,
See the new output below...
Removing all documents from your index because you said so.
All documents removed.
Indexing 558 users
Indexing 27878 review requests
ERROR:root:Error updating reviews using default
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Hi,
I just noticed that when running ".../djblets % python setup.py develop"
you now get the warning:
npm WARN deprecated uglifyjs@2.4.10: uglifyjs is deprecated - use uglify-js
instead.
Perhaps this is something you would like to look into before 3.0?
There's also a warning about
12 matches
Mail list logo