Re: Bitbucket webhook integration fail with Review Board 3.0.10, payload empty
Awesome, thank you. Is there documentation on upgrading to the new version ? On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 12:16:41 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > > We're aiming for next week (Tuesday, December 4th). > > Christian > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:15 PM > wrote: > >> Do you have a targeted release date for 3.0.11? We would really like to >> have it integrated but I don't want to do a bunch of scripting work for >> Jenkins if it's going to be in the next couple of months. >> >> On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 4:44:48 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> My understanding was that they'd be keeping the old service around >>> longer.. Well, we've been planning to move over to the new format, and >>> we'll just have to expedite it. >>> >>> Unfortunately, for now, there's no workaround. We'll need to address >>> this in 3.0.11. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:12 PM wrote: >>> Hello, I'm using bitbucket cloud, and I clicked setup webhook from my review board installation on the repository I want to set the hook up for. When I clicked the link it took me to bitbucket services which is a deprecated feature of bitbucket and the link isn't even present anymore. I set that up, but bitbucket gives you a message about the functionality being deprecated and no longer working and to utilize the new webhook setup. I set the webhook up in the new method of bitbucket webhooks by using the URL and the request gets a 400 response saying the payload is empty. However, when I view the body payload in bitbucket it is not empty. ype: repo:push Event time: a few seconds ago (Thursday, November 15th 2018, 3:54:31 pm) Response from http://mydomain.com/repos/3/bitbucket/hooks/{{uuid}}/close-submitted/ HTTP status: 400 Elapsed time: 38ms Request time: a few seconds ago (Thursday, November 15th 2018, 3:54:31 pm) Headers Content-Length 15 Content-Language en Vary Cookie,Accept-Language Server Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) Connection close Date Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:54:31 GMT X-Frame-OptionsSAMEORIGIN Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8 Body Missing payload Here is the actual payload sent to review board by bitbucket with new webhooks method obfuscated for security { "push": { "changes": [ { "forced": false, "old": { "target": { "hash": "{{uuid}}", "links": { "self": { "href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commit/{{uuid}}; }, "html": { "href": "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/{{uuid}}; } }, "author": { "raw": "MyName ", "type": "author" }, "summary": { "raw": "new file\n", "markup": "markdown", "html": "new file", "type": "rendered" }, "parents": [ { "type": "commit", "hash": "{{uuid}}", "links": { "self": { "href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commit/{{uuid}}; }, "html": { "href": "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/{{uuid}}; } } } ], "date": "2018-11-15T23:53:41+00:00", "message": "new file\n", "type": "commit" }, "links": { "commits": { "href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/test_branch_1; }, "self": { "href": "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/refs/branches/test_branch_1; }, "html": { "href": "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/branch/test_branch_1; } }, "default_merge_strategy": "merge_commit", "merge_strategies": [ "merge_commit", "squash", "fast_forward" ], "type": "branch", "name": "test_branch_1" }, "links": { "commits": { "href":
Re: Bitbucket webhook integration fail with Review Board 3.0.10, payload empty
We're aiming for next week (Tuesday, December 4th). Christian On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:15 PM wrote: > Do you have a targeted release date for 3.0.11? We would really like to > have it integrated but I don't want to do a bunch of scripting work for > Jenkins if it's going to be in the next couple of months. > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 4:44:48 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> My understanding was that they'd be keeping the old service around >> longer.. Well, we've been planning to move over to the new format, and >> we'll just have to expedite it. >> >> Unfortunately, for now, there's no workaround. We'll need to address this >> in 3.0.11. >> >> Christian >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:12 PM wrote: >> >>> Hello, I'm using bitbucket cloud, and I clicked setup webhook from my >>> review board installation on the repository I want to set the hook up for. >>> When I clicked the link it took me to bitbucket services which is a >>> deprecated feature of bitbucket and the link isn't even present anymore. I >>> set that up, but bitbucket gives you a message about the functionality >>> being deprecated and no longer working and to utilize the new webhook setup. >>> I set the webhook up in the new method of bitbucket webhooks by using the >>> URL and the request gets a 400 response saying the payload is empty. >>> However, when I view the body payload in bitbucket it is not empty. >>> >>> >>> ype: repo:push >>> Event time: a few seconds ago (Thursday, November 15th 2018, 3:54:31 pm) >>> Response from >>> http://mydomain.com/repos/3/bitbucket/hooks/{{uuid}}/close-submitted/ >>> HTTP status: 400 >>> Elapsed time: 38ms >>> Request time: a few seconds ago (Thursday, November 15th 2018, 3:54:31 pm) >>> Headers >>> Content-Length 15 >>> Content-Language en >>> Vary Cookie,Accept-Language >>> Server Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) >>> Connection close >>> Date Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:54:31 GMT >>> X-Frame-OptionsSAMEORIGIN >>> Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8 >>> Body >>> Missing payload >>> >>> Here is the actual payload sent to review board by bitbucket with new >>> webhooks method obfuscated for security >>> >>> { >>> "push": { >>> "changes": [ >>> { >>> "forced": false, >>> "old": { >>> "target": { >>> "hash": "{{uuid}}", >>> "links": { >>> "self": { >>> "href": >>> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commit/{{uuid}}; >>> }, >>> "html": { >>> "href": >>> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/{{uuid}}; >>> } >>> }, >>> "author": { >>> "raw": "MyName ", >>> "type": "author" >>> }, >>> "summary": { >>> "raw": "new file\n", >>> "markup": "markdown", >>> "html": "new file", >>> "type": "rendered" >>> }, >>> "parents": [ >>> { >>> "type": "commit", >>> "hash": "{{uuid}}", >>> "links": { >>> "self": { >>> "href": >>> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commit/{{uuid}}; >>> }, >>> "html": { >>> "href": >>> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/{{uuid}}; >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> ], >>> "date": "2018-11-15T23:53:41+00:00", >>> "message": "new file\n", >>> "type": "commit" >>> }, >>> "links": { >>> "commits": { >>> "href": >>> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/test_branch_1; >>> }, >>> "self": { >>> "href": >>> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/refs/branches/test_branch_1; >>> }, >>> "html": { >>> "href": >>> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/branch/test_branch_1; >>> } >>> }, >>> "default_merge_strategy": "merge_commit", >>> "merge_strategies": [ >>> "merge_commit", >>> "squash", >>> "fast_forward" >>> ], >>> "type": "branch", >>> "name": "test_branch_1" >>> }, >>> "links": { >>> "commits": { >>> "href": >>> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits?include={{uuid}}={{uuid}}; >>> }, >>> "html": { >>> "href": >>> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/branches/compare/{{uuid}}..{{uuid}}; >>> }, >>> "diff": { >>> "href": >>>
Re: Bitbucket webhook integration fail with Review Board 3.0.10, payload empty
Do you have a targeted release date for 3.0.11? We would really like to have it integrated but I don't want to do a bunch of scripting work for Jenkins if it's going to be in the next couple of months. On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 4:44:48 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi, > > My understanding was that they'd be keeping the old service around > longer.. Well, we've been planning to move over to the new format, and > we'll just have to expedite it. > > Unfortunately, for now, there's no workaround. We'll need to address this > in 3.0.11. > > Christian > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:12 PM > wrote: > >> Hello, I'm using bitbucket cloud, and I clicked setup webhook from my review >> board installation on the repository I want to set the hook up for. >> When I clicked the link it took me to bitbucket services which is a >> deprecated feature of bitbucket and the link isn't even present anymore. I >> set that up, but bitbucket gives you a message about the functionality being >> deprecated and no longer working and to utilize the new webhook setup. >> I set the webhook up in the new method of bitbucket webhooks by using the >> URL and the request gets a 400 response saying the payload is empty. >> However, when I view the body payload in bitbucket it is not empty. >> >> >> ype: repo:push >> Event time: a few seconds ago (Thursday, November 15th 2018, 3:54:31 pm) >> Response from >> http://mydomain.com/repos/3/bitbucket/hooks/{{uuid}}/close-submitted/ >> HTTP status: 400 >> Elapsed time: 38ms >> Request time: a few seconds ago (Thursday, November 15th 2018, 3:54:31 pm) >> Headers >> Content-Length 15 >> Content-Language en >> Vary Cookie,Accept-Language >> Server Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) >> Connection close >> Date Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:54:31 GMT >> X-Frame-OptionsSAMEORIGIN >> Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8 >> Body >> Missing payload >> >> Here is the actual payload sent to review board by bitbucket with new >> webhooks method obfuscated for security >> >> { >> "push": { >> "changes": [ >> { >> "forced": false, >> "old": { >> "target": { >> "hash": "{{uuid}}", >> "links": { >> "self": { >> "href": >> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commit/{{uuid}}; >> }, >> "html": { >> "href": >> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/{{uuid}}; >> } >> }, >> "author": { >> "raw": "MyName ", >> "type": "author" >> }, >> "summary": { >> "raw": "new file\n", >> "markup": "markdown", >> "html": "new file", >> "type": "rendered" >> }, >> "parents": [ >> { >> "type": "commit", >> "hash": "{{uuid}}", >> "links": { >> "self": { >> "href": >> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commit/{{uuid}}; >> }, >> "html": { >> "href": >> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/{{uuid}}; >> } >> } >> } >> ], >> "date": "2018-11-15T23:53:41+00:00", >> "message": "new file\n", >> "type": "commit" >> }, >> "links": { >> "commits": { >> "href": >> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits/test_branch_1; >> }, >> "self": { >> "href": >> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/refs/branches/test_branch_1; >> }, >> "html": { >> "href": >> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/branch/test_branch_1; >> } >> }, >> "default_merge_strategy": "merge_commit", >> "merge_strategies": [ >> "merge_commit", >> "squash", >> "fast_forward" >> ], >> "type": "branch", >> "name": "test_branch_1" >> }, >> "links": { >> "commits": { >> "href": >> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/commits?include={{uuid}}={{uuid}}; >> }, >> "html": { >> "href": >> "https://bitbucket.org/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/branches/compare/{{uuid}}..{{uuid}}; >> }, >> "diff": { >> "href": >> "https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/DevTeam/ProjectCode-scratch/diff/{{uuid}}..{{uuid}}; >> } >> }, >> "truncated": false, >> "commits": [ >> { >> "hash": "{{uuid}}", >> "links": { >>
Re: RBTools Ticket #3659: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to differentiate the binary content
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3659/ -- New update by shahgu**@gmai* (Google Code) For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools > Ticket #3659 Reply: Fixed in RBTools release-1.0.x (c09cb82). This will ship in RBTools 1.0.2. Thanks! Status: - PendingReview + Fixed -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.